scorable_negotiation — scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-d0f124ab0e

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Avery (Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0
Your acceptance threshold: 57.2969 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Blake (Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0
Your acceptance threshold: 50.3906 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Casey (Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61
Your acceptance threshold: 59.7812 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Devon (Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0
Your acceptance threshold: 46.1719 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Ember (Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0
Your acceptance threshold: 87.3906 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

You are one of 6 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Blake — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)
- Devon — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)
- Ember — Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)
- Flynn — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Build schedule: three years, phased over eight years, five years
- Site access: existing haul route, new spur road, rail siding
- Compensation: annual community fund, one-off site payment, rates abatement
- Hiring: open recruitment, apprenticeship programme, local hiring pact
- Cooling: air cooling, closed-loop plant, river draw

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember, Flynn); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when every party still at the table has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every party's score sheet is common knowledge and is listed below — there is no private information, so any inefficiency is a pure negotiation failure.

All parties' score sheets (common knowledge):
Avery (threshold 57.2969):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=53, new spur road=0, rail siding=26
- Compensation: annual community fund=24, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=47
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=79, local hiring pact=40
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Blake (threshold 50.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=20, new spur road=0, rail siding=10
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=81, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=41
- Cooling: air cooling=30, closed-loop plant=59, river draw=0

Casey (threshold 59.7812):
- Build schedule: three years=0, phased over eight years=0, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=54, new spur road=0, rail siding=27
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=63, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=32
- Cooling: air cooling=31, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=61

Devon (threshold 46.1719):
- Build schedule: three years=84, phased over eight years=0, five years=42
- Site access: existing haul route=21, new spur road=0, rail siding=11
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=48, local hiring pact=24
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Ember (threshold 87.3906):
- Build schedule: three years=41, phased over eight years=0, five years=20
- Site access: existing haul route=49, new spur road=0, rail siding=25
- Compensation: annual community fund=39, one-off site payment=79, rates abatement=0
- Hiring: open recruitment=0, apprenticeship programme=83, local hiring pact=42
- Cooling: air cooling=0, closed-loop plant=0, river draw=0

Flynn (threshold 130):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Flynn (Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Build schedule: three years=47, phased over eight years=95, five years=0
- Site access: existing haul route=27, new spur road=0, rail siding=14
- Compensation: annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=65, rates abatement=33
- Hiring: open recruitment=72, apprenticeship programme=0, local hiring pact=36
- Cooling: air cooling=93, closed-loop plant=47, river draw=0
Your acceptance threshold: 130 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.