scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-617a07a162

model Qwen3-8B · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L2-0aa50f7b83 · seed 0 · status done · {"cell": "five_seat_robustness__qwen_datacenter__all_llm", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "qwen_datacenter", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5", "framing": "datacenter", "framing_map": {"framing": "datacenter", "title": "Northgate data-centre siting agreement", "issue_names": ["Location", "Compensation", "Power supply", "Cooling"], "option_labels": [["Kestrel Park", "Weir Flats", "Dunlow Yard", "Anvil Ridge"], ["rates abatement", "in-kind infrastructure", "one-off site payment", "annual community fund"], ["solar with storage", "on-site turbines", "grid tie-in", "shared substation"], ["reclaimed water", "air cooling", "closed-loop plant", "river draw"]], "party_roles": ["Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)", "Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)", "Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)", "Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)", "Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)"]}}

Game setup

Turns

[0] Avery — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Anvil Ridge", "Compensation": "rates abatement", "Power supply": "solar with storage", "Cooling": "air cooling"}
💬 I propose a deal with solar power, air cooling, rates abatement, and Anvil Ridge location. This meets my threshold of 77.
Maximizing my points: Solar with storage (92) + Air cooling (58) + Rates abatement (20) = 170. Location neutral, so pick Anvil Ridge.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0.65

[1] Blake — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 clears my threshold. I accept this offer.
P1 meets my threshold (122 points vs 55). Accepting now ensures the deal progresses.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[2] Casey — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept to advance the deal.
Current deal P1 scores 174 (above threshold). Accepting it now adds my support, pushing toward closure. Blake's veto is satisfied. Others may follow.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[3] Devon — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Anvil Ridge", "Compensation": "rates abatement", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Cooling": "closed-loop plant"}
💬 P1 meets my threshold, but I can push for a better deal with shared substation and closed-loop plant.
P1 scores 141 (above threshold). Accepting now ensures deal closure, but Ember may reject. Proposing a better deal with shared substation and closed-loop plant could improve my score further.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+4.1

[4] Ember — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to move the deal forward.
P2 scores 91, above my threshold. Accepting it would add my support, but others may not. Need to push for closure.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[5] Blake — turn (round 2)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Anvil Ridge", "Compensation": "rates abatement", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Cooling": "air cooling"}
💬 I propose an updated offer combining P1's cooling and compensation with shared substation to meet Devon's needs.
P1 meets my threshold, but needs Devon and Ember. P2 is below my threshold. I must table a new offer that improves for them.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+25.5, bestresponse=+1.9

[6] Casey — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P3
💬 P3 meets my threshold. I accept to support closing the deal.
P3 scores 174 (above threshold). Accepting P3 would add my support, and with Blake already on board, we need Devon and Ember. However, P1 already has Avery, Blake, and Casey. If I accept P3, it might be better to push for P1 to get all needed acceptors.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[7] Devon — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to move the deal forward.
P2 has 276 points, which is well above my threshold. Accepting it would add my support, but Blake and Casey already accepted P3. However, P3's cooling is air cooling (0), which I value less. To close the deal, I need Blake's acceptance. Since Blake already accepted P1 and P3, but P3's cooling is suboptimal, I should push for P2. If I accept P2, it gains me 276 points, and with Ember's acceptance, it's two parties. But need Blake and Casey to accept. However, Blake may prefer P1. Alternatively, propose a new deal with shared substation and closed-loop plant to meet my needs.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[8] Ember — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2
💬 I support P2's terms, which meet my threshold. Let's push for closure.
P2 scores 91 (above threshold), but needs more accepts. P3 scores 40 (below threshold). Accepting P2 is better. However, need to check if others can align.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[9] Avery — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P3
💬 I accept P3 to support closing the deal. Let's finalize this offer.
P3 scores 78, meets my threshold. Accepting it would bring us closer to closure. Blake and Casey are already on board. Need Devon and Ember to accept.
oracle regret: threshold=+92, acceptance=+92, bestresponse=+0

[10] Casey — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P3
💬 I support P3's terms. Let's secure the remaining votes to finalize this offer.
P3 meets my threshold (174) and aligns with my top cooling preference. I need to secure Devon and Ember's acceptance to close the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[11] Devon — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P3
💬 I accept P3 to move toward closure. Let's finalize this deal.
P3 has 216 points (surplus +87), meeting my threshold. Accepting P3 would bring total acceptances to 4 (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon). Need Ember's acceptance. But Ember already accepted P2. However, P2 has higher cooling (closed-loop plant) which might align better with their preferences. Let's accept P3 to secure closure, as it meets my threshold and has majority support.
oracle regret: threshold=+60, acceptance=+60, bestresponse=+0

[12] Ember — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.
P2 scores 91, above my threshold. Accepting P2 would secure closure with remaining votes.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[13] Avery — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P3
💬 P3 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.
Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Avery, and I need to decide my next move. The current situation is that there are three live offers: P1, P2, and P3. First, let me check the details of each offer as they relate to me. My score sheet is private, but I remember my thresholds. My acceptance threshold is 77 points. Looking at P1: Location is Anvil Ridge (0 points), Compensation is rates abatement (20), Power supply is solar with storage (92), Cooling is air cooling (58). Adding those up: 0 + 20 + 92 + 58 = 170. That's way above my threshold of 77. P1 is already accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. But Devon and Ember have accepted P2 and P3. P2: Location same, Compensation same, Power supply is shared substation (0), Cooling is closed-loop plant (0). Total is 20 + 0 + 0 = 20. That's way below my threshold. So I shouldn't accept this. But Devon and Ember have accepted it. P3: Location Anvil Ridge (0), Compensation rates abatement (20), Power supply shared substation (0), Cooling air cooling (58). Total is 20 + 58 = 78. That's just 1 point above my threshold. So P3 meets my threshold. Now, the current state: P3 has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Only Ember has accepted P2. Wait, the mediator's message says P3 is the standing offer. The problem is that the deal needs all 5 parties to accept the same offer. Currently, P3 has Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon accepting. Ember has accepted P2. So if I accept P3, then all except Ember would have accepted P3. But Ember has accepted P2. So unless Ember switches to P3, the deal can't close. But the user's last message shows that Ember accepted P2. So the current accepts are: P1: Avery, Blake, Casey. P2: Devon, Ember. P3: Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Wait, the mediator's state shows that P3 has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So that's four parties. Only Ember hasn't accepted yet. But Ember has accepted P2. So if I accept P3, then the parties accepting P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, and if I accept, then that's five. But Ember is on P2. So the deal can't close unless Ember switches. Wait, no. Because the deal closes when all parties accept the same offer. So if P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), and Ember is on P2. So unless Ember accepts P3, the deal can't close. But the problem is that the current standing offer is P3. So maybe the mediator is trying to get Ember to accept P3. But according to the last message, the user (Avery) is to take action. So what options are available? Avery can either accept P3, which would make it five acceptances (if Ember hasn't accepted P3). But since Ember has accepted P2, they might not switch. Alternatively, Avery could reject P3 and propose a new offer. But the user's previous action was to accept P3. Wait, the user (Avery) has already accepted P3. Wait, looking back, in the previous messages, Avery accepted P3. Wait, the last message from the mediator shows that the standing offer is P3, which has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So the only remaining party is Ember. So if I (Avery) accept P3, then the deal would have all five parties? Wait, no. Because Blake is a veto party. Wait, the initial setup says Blake holds a veto. So the deal can't pass unless every veto party (Blake) accepts. Wait, but Blake has already accepted P1 and then P3. Wait, the rules state: "Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts." So if Blake has accepted, then the veto is satisfied. So the current standing offer is P3, with four acceptances: Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Only Ember remains. If Ember accepts P3, then all five parties have accepted, and the deal closes. But Ember has accepted P2. So if Ember switches to P3, then the deal can close. But the user (Avery) is to take action now. Since the current round is Round 3, and it's Avery's turn.
oracle regret: threshold=+92, acceptance=+92, bestresponse=+0

[14] Blake — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P3
💬 P3 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.
Okay, let's see. I'm Blake, and I need to decide whether to accept, reject, or walk on the current offers. The live offers are P1, P2, and P3. First, looking at my own scores. My threshold is 55 points. For each offer, I need to calculate my total points. P1 has Cooling as air cooling, which is worth 87 points to me. Compensation is rates abatement at 35. Power supply is solar with storage, which I value at 0. Location is Anvil Ridge, also 0. So total is 87 + 35 = 122. That's way above my threshold. But wait, the mediator's data says P1's total is 122, which matches. P1 is already accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. But Devon and Ember accepted P2 and P3. P2 has Cooling as closed-loop plant, which I value at 0. So my total here is only 35 (from compensation). That's below my threshold of 55. So I can't accept P2. P3 has Cooling as air cooling (87) and compensation rates abatement (35), so 87 +35 = 122 again. Power supply is shared substation (0) and location Anvil Ridge (0). So total is 122. P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Ember accepted P2. Now, the current state: the standing offer is P2, but P3 is also on the table. The problem is that P2 doesn't meet my threshold, so I can't accept it. But P3 does meet my threshold. However, the acceptance counts: P3 has 4 acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon). The quorum is 5 parties. So if I accept P3, that would make 5 acceptances (since I'm Blake). But wait, the original parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. So if P3 has 4 acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), then adding my acceptance would make it 5. But wait, the mediator's data shows P3's accepts as [3,1,0,2], which might be the seats. Let me check again. Wait, the offer_accepts for P3 are [3,1,0,2], which probably corresponds to the parties. But maybe it's better to look at the counts. The key is that P3 has 4 acceptances already (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), and Ember has accepted P2. So if I accept P3, then P3 would have all 5 parties except Ember. Wait, no: the current acceptances for P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So that's four parties. If I accept P3, that's five parties. But Ember has accepted P2. So if I accept P3, then P3 would have all five parties? Wait, no. Because the parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. If P3 has Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, and I (Blake) accept it, that's five parties. But Blake is already accepting P3. Wait, the initial acceptances for P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So that's four. Then if I accept it again? Wait, no. The action is to accept an offer. If I'm already accepting P3, maybe the counts are different. Wait, looking back, the mediator's data says P3 is accepted by [3,1,0,2], which might be the seats. The seats are Avery (0), Blake (1), Casey (2), Devon (3), Ember (4). So P3's accepts are [3,1,0,2], meaning parties 3 (Devon), 1 (Blake), 0 (Avery), 2 (Casey). So that's four parties. So if I (Blake) accept P3, that's already part of the accepts. So maybe the current accepts for P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So four parties. Then, if I accept P3, that's already done. Wait, the user's message says that Avery accepted P3, Blake accepted P3, Casey accepted P3, Devon accepted P3. So that's four parties. Then, the fifth is Ember. If Ember hasn't accepted P3, then P3 needs Ember's acceptance. But Ember has accepted P2. So for P3 to close, it needs all five parties. Currently, four have accepted it (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon). So if I accept P3, that's already done. Wait, no. Wait, the user's message shows that [A
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[15] Devon — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3
💬 P3 is strong and meets my threshold. I'll accept it to finalize the deal.
P3 has 4 acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon). Ember is the only one left. Since Blake is the veto party and has accepted, the deal can close if Ember accepts. But I need to check if P3 meets my threshold. P3's total is 216, which is above my 129. However, Ember might have a different threshold. Alternatively, I could propose a new offer to ensure closure.
oracle regret: threshold=+60, acceptance=+60, bestresponse=+0

[16] Ember — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I'll accept it to finalize the deal.
P2 scores 91 (above threshold), but only Devon and me have accepted it. P3 has 40 (below threshold) with 4 acceptances. Accepting P3 would fail my threshold. I need to push for P2 to gain enough support.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[17] Avery — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3
Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Avery, and the negotiation is in the fourth round. The live offers are P1, P2, and P3. Let me check the details again. First, my own scores. For the current issues, the options are: - Location: Anvil Ridge (which I have 0 points for) - Compensation: rates abatement (20 points) - Power supply: shared substation (0 points) - Cooling: air cooling (58 points) So, for P3, the deal is Location=Anvil Ridge, Compensation=rates abatement, Power supply=shared substation, Cooling=air cooling. My total here is 20 (compensation) + 58 (cooling) = 78 points. My threshold is 77, so this is just above. Looking at the acceptance status: P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Ember has accepted P2 instead. Wait, but Blake is the veto party. Wait, the problem says that Blake is a veto party, so no deal passes without Blake's acceptance. Let me check the current acceptances. The Mediator's state says P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Wait, but the original parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. So P3 has four acceptances: Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. That leaves Ember. But Ember has accepted P2. Wait, but the Mediator's message shows that P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So if all parties except Ember have accepted P3, but Ember has accepted P2. However, the deal requires all parties (including veto party) to accept the same offer. So if Ember hasn't accepted P3, then P3 isn't closed yet. Wait, the Mediator's "offer_accepts" for P3 is [3,1,0,2]. Let me check the indices. The parties are Avery (0), Blake (1), Casey (2), Devon (3), Ember (4). So P3 is accepted by Avery (0), Blake (1), Casey (2), Devon (3). So that's four parties. But Ember (4) hasn't accepted P3. So P3 needs Ember's acceptance to close. However, Ember has accepted P2. But the problem is that the deal must have all parties accept the same offer. So if Ember has accepted P2, but others have accepted P3, then P3 can't close unless Ember switches to P3. But Ember's last message was accepting P2. But the current round is the fourth, and it's my turn. The Mediator's message says that the standing offer is P3. So maybe the others are trying to push for P3. But Ember has accepted P2, so if they don't switch, then P3 can't close. However, Blake is the veto party, but since Blake has accepted P3, and the others have accepted P3 except Ember, then the deal would close once Ember accepts P3. But Ember has accepted P2. Wait, but the problem states that a deal closes when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including veto party) have formally accepted the same standing offer. Since there are only 5 parties, all must accept the same offer. So for P3 to close, all five must accept it. Currently, P3 has Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon (four parties) accepting it. Ember has accepted P2. So unless Ember switches to P3, P3 can't close. But Ember's last action was accepting P2. So, what's the situation? The Mediator's message says that the standing offer is P3. So maybe the others are pushing for P3, and I need to see if I can get Ember to accept P3. However, since it's my turn, I need to decide whether to accept P3, reject it, or propose something else. But my own score for P3 is 78, which is above my threshold. So I would accept P3 if it's the standing offer. But if Ember hasn't accepted P3, then the deal isn't closed. However, in the current Mediator state, P3 has four acceptances. So if I accept P3, then it would have all five parties. Wait, no. Wait, the parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. If Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon have accepted P3, then if I (Avery) accept P3 again, that doesn't change anything. Wait, no. Wait, the "offer_accepts" for P3 is [3,1,0,2], which I think corresponds to the parties. Let me check again: The Mediator's "offer_accepts": {"P1": [
oracle regret: threshold=+92, acceptance=+92, bestresponse=+0

[18] Blake — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3
Okay, let's see. I'm Blake, and I need to decide whether to accept P1, P2, or P3. The problem is that the deal has to be accepted by all parties, including me as the veto party. Looking at the current offers: P1 has a total of 122 points for me, which is above my threshold of 55. It's already accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. But Devon and Ember have accepted P2 and P3. Wait, but the current state shows that P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Ember is still on P2. Wait, the last messages show that Ember accepted P2, but then Avery and others are accepting P3. But the Mediator's message says that P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So the active offers are P1, P2, P3. But the problem is that for a deal to close, all parties must accept the same offer. Right now, P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), but Ember has accepted P2. So if Ember is on P2 and others are on P3, there's a split. But Blake is the veto party. So if I accept P3, then the parties that accepted P2 (Ember) need to switch. But since the Mediator's last message says that the standing offer is P2, maybe there's some confusion. Wait, the Mediator says "standing": "P2", which might mean that P2 is the current active offer. But in reality, P3 has more acceptances. Wait, the user's last message shows that [Ember] accepted P2, and [Avery] accepted P3. So there's a split. But since Blake is the veto party, the deal can't pass unless all parties accept the same offer. So, what's the current status? Let's check the offer_accepts: P1: accepted by [1,0,2] (Blake, Avery, Casey) P2: accepted by [3,4] (Devon, Ember) P3: accepted by [3,1,0,2] (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon) So, P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), but Ember is on P2. So to close the deal, either Ember needs to switch to P3, or P2 needs to get the required acceptances. But since Blake is the veto party, the deal can't pass unless all parties accept the same offer. Since the Mediator's standing is P2, maybe the current active offer is P2. But if P3 has four acceptances (excluding Ember), but Ember is on P2. So the deal can't close unless Ember switches. But Blake's action is needed. Since Blake is the veto party, and the deal can't pass without Blake's acceptance. Wait, the rules say that Blake holds a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts. So if Blake accepts P3, and others accept P3, then the deal can close. But Ember is on P2. Wait, the current acceptances for P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. So four parties. But Ember is on P2. So if Blake accepts P3, then the deal can't close unless Ember also accepts P3. But Ember has already accepted P2. So unless Ember switches, the deal can't close. But maybe the Mediator is allowing multiple offers to be on the table. So Blake can accept P3, which has four acceptances (excluding Ember). But since the deal needs all parties to accept the same offer, Blake's acceptance of P3 would mean that the deal can only close if Ember also accepts P3. Alternatively, maybe Blake can accept P2. But P2's total for Blake is 35 points, which is below his threshold of 55. Wait, no, the Mediator's data says for P2: Blake's points are 35, which is below his threshold. So Blake can't accept P2 because it doesn't meet his threshold. So Blake can only accept P1 or P3. P1's total is 122 (which is above threshold), and P3's total is also 122. So Blake can accept either. But the current acceptances for P3 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. If Blake accepts P3, then the deal needs Ember to accept P3 as well. But if Blake accepts P3, and others are already on P3, but Ember is on P2, then the deal can't close unless Ember switches. Alternatively, maybe the Mediator is allowing the deal to close once the majority of parties have accepted. But according to the rules, a deal closes only
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[19] Casey — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3
💬 I accept P3 to finalize the deal. Let's secure the final vote.
P3 scores 174 (above threshold). Accepting P3 secures 4 votes; need Ember to join. Since P2 is below my threshold, I must push for P3.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[20] Ember — final_proposal (round 5)

ACCEPT P3
Okay, let's see. The mediator is giving me my final move. I need to decide whether to propose one last deal or walk. Let me check the current state. First, the live offers: P1, P2, P3. My scores for each: P1: Cooling is air cooling, which I value at 0. Compensation is rates abatement (40). Power is solar with storage (0). Location Anvil Ridge (0). Total 40. My threshold is 42, so it's 2 below. Accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. But I didn't accept it yet. P2: Cooling is closed-loop plant (51), compensation same (40). Power is shared substation (0). Location same. Total 91, which is way above my threshold. Accepted by Devon and me. But others haven't accepted yet. P3: Cooling is air cooling (0), so total is 40 again. Accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. But I'm Ember, and I accepted P2 earlier. Wait, in the previous steps, I accepted P2, but now the mediator says the live offers are P1, P2, P3. Wait, maybe P3 is the current standing offer? Wait, the mediator's message says that the rounds are over, and the live offers are P1, P2, P3. But the negotiation state shows that P3 is the standing offer. But I need to check my own points for each offer. My secret scores: For Cooling, closed-loop plant is 51. So P2 has that. So P2 gives me 40 (compensation) +51 (cooling) = 91. That's way above my threshold. But the problem is that the other parties might not have accepted it yet. Let me check the offer_accepts: For P2, the accepts are [3,4], which I think refers to the proposers. Wait, maybe the offer_accepts list shows which parties have accepted. The offer_accepts for P2 is [3,4], but there are only 5 parties (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember). So maybe 3 and 4 are indexes. Let me think: if the parties are numbered 0-4, then 3 is Devon, 4 is Ember. So P2 is accepted by Devon and Ember. But the others (Avery, Blake, Casey) have accepted P3. But Blake is a veto party. For a deal to pass, all veto parties (Blake) must accept. Let's check the current accepts. P3 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Wait, the offer_accepts for P3 is [3,1,0,2], which would be Devon (3), Blake (1), Avery (0), and Casey (2). So Blake has accepted P3. But Blake is the veto party. So if P3 is accepted by all parties except maybe Ember? Wait, the mediator says that the live offers are P1, P2, P3. But in the last steps, Avery, Blake, Casey accepted P3, and Devon and Ember accepted P2. So there are two offers on the table: P2 and P3. But the mediator is saying that the rounds are over, and it's my final move. Wait, the current standing offer is P3, which has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. But I (Ember) accepted P2. So if P3 has four acceptances, but Blake is a veto party. Wait, Blake is a veto party, so the deal can't pass unless Blake accepts. But Blake has accepted P3. So if P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon) and I (Ember) haven't accepted it yet. Wait, in the previous messages, I accepted P2. So the current situation is that P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), and I (Ember) accepted P2. But the mediator is now asking me to make my final move. Wait, the problem is that the deal requires all parties to accept the same offer. So if P3 has four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon), but Ember hasn't accepted it. So if I accept P3, then all five parties would have accepted it, and since Blake is a veto party, and he has accepted, then the deal would pass. But if I don't accept P3, and instead accept P2, but P2 has only Devon and Ember accepting. So the other parties (Avery, Blake, Casey) have accepted P3. So if I accept P3, then the deal is done. But let me check the numbers. For P3, my score is 40 (compensation) +
oracle regret: threshold=+51, acceptance=+51, bestresponse=+16.2

Outcome

deal: {"Location": "Anvil Ridge", "Compensation": "rates abatement", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Cooling": "air cooling"} (closed by consensus)

primary 0.9736 · USW 235.0 · ESW -2.0 · NSW 0.0 · Gini 0.4229 · per-party surplus [1.0, 67.0, 82.0, 87.0, -2.0]