scorable_negotiation-moves

model Qwen3-8B · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L4-d49e5fe070 · seed 1 · status done ·

{"cell": "five_seat_robustness__qwen_datacenter__all_llm", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "qwen_datacenter", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5", "framing": "datacenter", "framing_map": {"framing": "datacenter", "title": "Northgate data-centre siting agreement", "issue_names": ["Location", "Power supply", "Build schedule", "Hiring"], "option_labels": [["Anvil Ridge", "Dunlow Yard", "Kestrel Park", "Weir Flats"], ["on-site turbines", "solar with storage", "grid tie-in", "shared substation"], ["five years", "three years", "phased over eight years", "eighteen months"], ["apprenticeship programme", "union hall referral", "local hiring pact", "open recruitment"]], "party_roles": ["Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)", "Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)", "Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)", "Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)", "Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)"]}}

Game setup

Turns

[0] Blake — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Kestrel Park", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

💬 I propose Kestrel Park location, shared substation power, union hall hiring, and eighteen-month build to balance efficiency and community needs.

Maximizing my points: Kestrel Park (53) + shared substation (27) + union hall referral (85) = 165. Build schedule neutral at 0. Threshold 93 met.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+2.75

[1] Casey — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Weir Flats", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

💬 P1 is below my threshold. I propose Weir Flats location, shared substation power, and any build schedule/hiring to meet my needs.

P1 scores 32, below my threshold. Need to push for Weir Flats location and shared substation power to reach 56+32=88. Build schedule and hiring are zeros, but no better options. Reject P1 and propose my preferred package.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[2] Devon — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Kestrel Park", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "five years", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

💬 I propose Kestrel Park, shared substation, five-year build, and union hall hiring to meet my threshold.

P1 and P2 are below threshold. Need to propose a deal with Kestrel Park (48), shared substation (26), five-year schedule (69), and any hiring (0). Total 143 > 79.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+1.25

[3] Ember — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P2

💬 P2 scores 239 for me. I accept to support moving forward with Casey's proposal.

P2 meets my threshold and has Casey's support. Blake's acceptance is critical. I'll accept P2 to push for consensus.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[4] Avery — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1

💬 P1 scores 132 for me. I accept to move forward.

P1 meets my threshold. Blake has accepted; I can support it. Others need to accept too, but I can't force them. Accepting P1 is safe.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+21, bestresponse=+0

[5] Casey — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2

💬 P2 clears my bar. I accept to support closing the deal.

P2 meets my threshold. I accept to push for closure.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[6] Devon — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P3

💬 P3 meets my threshold. I'll accept it to push for closure.

P3 scores 143, above my threshold. Need others to accept it. Blake's acceptance is critical.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[7] Ember — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2

💬 I accept P2 to support closing the deal. Let's get Blake on board.

P2 has 239 points for me. Need to get others to accept it. Blake must accept for it to close. If P1 gets enough, but Blake is on P1. Better to push P2.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[8] Avery — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P1

💬 I accept P1 to push for closure. Let's get everyone on board.

P1 meets my threshold (132) and Blake has already accepted. Need to secure remaining parties.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+21, bestresponse=+0

[9] Blake — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P1

💬 I accept P1 to finalize the deal and meet the quorum.

P1 scores 165 (above threshold), accepted by Avery and me. P2 scores 112 (above threshold), accepted by Casey and Ember. P3 scores 165, accepted by Devon. Need to choose between P1 or P2 to meet quorum.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[10] Devon — turn (round 3)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Kestrel Park", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "five years", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

💬 P3 meets my threshold. I propose it to close the deal.

P3 scores 143 (above threshold). Need to get others to accept. P1 needs more acceptances but below my threshold. Propose P3 to meet my bar and push for closure.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+31.8, bestresponse=+1.25

[11] Ember — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P2

💬 I support P2 and urge Blake to accept it to finalize the deal.

P2 has my highest location score and meets my threshold. Blake's acceptance is needed for the deal to pass. I'll push to get him on board.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[12] Avery — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P1

💬 P1 is the only viable option meeting my threshold. Let's secure the remaining acceptances.

P1 meets my threshold and has Blake's acceptance. Need Casey, Devon, Ember to accept P1 to close the deal. P2 and P3 are below my threshold. Best to push for P1.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+21, bestresponse=+0

[13] Blake — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P1

💬 P1 and P3 score 165 for me. I'll accept P1 to finalize the deal.

Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Blake, and I need to decide whether to accept, reject, or walk away from the current offers. The goal is to get a deal that meets my acceptance threshold of 93 points. Looking at the live offers: - P1 has a total of 165 points for me. The breakdown is Location Kestrel Park (53), Power supply shared substation (27), Build schedule eighteen months (0), Hiring union hall referral (85). That adds up to 53+27+0+85=165. My threshold is 93, so this is well above. But wait, the Build schedule is eighteen months, which I have a score of 0. But maybe the other parties have different scores. However, the problem says that each party's score is private, so I only know my own. Wait, the Mediator's state shows that P1 is accepted by Avery and Blake. But the current round is Round 3, and it's my turn. The offers on the table are P1, P2, P3, P4. Looking at my own scores: - Location: Kestrel Park is 53, Weir Flats is 0. - Power supply: shared substation is 27. - Build schedule: all options are 0. - Hiring: union hall referral is 85. So for any offer that includes Kestrel Park, shared substation, and union hall referral, my score would be 53 + 27 + 85 = 165, plus whatever the build schedule adds. But my build schedule scores are all 0. So regardless of the build schedule, my total would be 165. Looking at the offers: - P1: Kestrel Park, shared substation, eighteen months, union hall. Total 165. Accepted by Avery and Blake. - P2: Weir Flats, shared substation, eighteen months, union hall. Total 0 (location) +27 +0 +85= 112. Accepted by Casey and Ember. - P3: Kestrel Park, shared substation, five years, union hall. Total 53+27+0+85=165. Accepted by Devon. - P4: Same as P3? The mediator's state says P4 is same as P3? Wait, the offers P3 and P4 have the same details. Maybe a duplicate? So, the question is, which offer should I accept? Since I'm the veto party, the deal can't pass without me. The current accepts are: - P1: Avery and Blake. - P2: Casey and Ember. - P3: Devon. - P4: Devon. So, for P1, two acceptances (Avery and Blake). But to close the deal, all parties must accept the same offer. So, if I accept P1, then the acceptances would be Avery, Blake, and others? Wait, the Mediator's state shows that P1 is accepted by Avery and Blake. But the other parties (Casey, Devon, Ember) have accepted other offers. But the deal closes only when all parties have accepted the same offer. So, if I accept P1, then the acceptances for P1 would be Avery, Blake, and maybe others if they switch. But the problem is that the other parties have accepted different offers. Wait, the current situation is that there are multiple offers on the table. For example, P1 is accepted by Avery and Blake. P2 by Casey and Ember. P3 by Devon. P4 by Devon. So, for the deal to close, all parties must accept the same offer. So, if I accept P1, then I need the others to accept P1 as well. But right now, Casey and Ember have accepted P2, Devon has accepted P3 and P4. But the problem is that the parties can only accept a live offer. So, if I accept P1, that would make the acceptances for P1: Avery, Blake, and me. But the others have accepted other offers. So unless they switch, the deal can't close. Alternatively, if I accept P3, which has the same score as P1 (165), then maybe Devon is already on board. But the others would need to switch. But since I'm the veto party, and the deal can't pass without me, I need to choose an offer that I can accept and that others can accept as well. Wait, looking at the current state, P3 is accepted by Devon. If I accept P3, then the acceptances would be

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[14] Casey — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P2

💬 I support P2. Let's secure Blake's acceptance to finalize.

P2 scores 88 (above threshold) with Casey and Ember. Need Blake and others to switch. But Blake accepted P1. If P1 has Avery and Blake, need others to join. However, P2 is better for me. Let's push P2 to get Blake on board.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[15] Ember — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P2

💬 I support P2. Let's secure Blake's acceptance to finalize.

P2 scores 239, above my threshold. Need Blake's acceptance to close the deal.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[16] Avery — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P1

💬 P1 is viable. Let's finalize with P1.

P1 meets my threshold (132) and has Blake's acceptance. Need to secure remaining acceptances.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+21, bestresponse=+0

[17] Blake — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P1

💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.

Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Blake, and I'm the veto party. The deal needs all parties to accept the same offer. Let me check the current offers. Looking at the live offers: P1, P2, P3, P4. My scores for each: - P1: Location Kestrel Park (53) + shared substation (27) + eighteen months (0) + union hall (85) = 165. My threshold is 93, so that's way above. Accepted by Avery and me. But need everyone else to accept too. - P2: Weir Flats (0) + shared substation (27) + eighteen months (0) + union hall (85) = 112. That's above threshold. Accepted by Casey, Ember, and me? Wait, in the previous messages, Avery accepted P1, Casey and Ember accepted P2, Devon accepted P3. But the current state shows P1 has Avery and Blake accepting. Wait, the mediator's state says P1 is accepted by [2, 3, 3, 1], which might be the parties. Wait, maybe the numbers are the counts. Wait, the "offer_accepts" for P1 is [1,0], which might mean Avery (seat 1) and someone else? Wait, maybe I need to check the current acceptances. Wait, the current live offers are P1, P2, P3, P4. Let me check which ones are accepted by whom. From the mediator's state: - P1 is accepted by Avery (seat 0?) and Blake (seat 1?), but the exact seats might not matter. The key is that for P1, the acceptors are Avery and Blake. For P2, accepted by Casey, Ember, and maybe others? The "offer_accepts" for P2 is [4,2], which might be the counts. But perhaps the important part is that P2 has Casey and Ember accepting, and maybe others. But the problem is that the deal needs all five parties to accept the same offer. So, for P1, Avery and Blake have accepted. But Casey, Devon, and Ember need to accept as well. However, in the current state, Casey and Ember have accepted P2, and Devon has accepted P3. So, there's a split. Now, the current round is Round 4, and it's my turn. The options are to accept an offer, reject, or walk. Since I'm the veto party, I can't walk because that would mean no deal, but maybe others can. But the goal is to get all parties to accept the same offer. Looking at the offers: - P1: 165 points for me. Accepted by Avery and Blake. Need Casey, Devon, Ember to accept. But Casey and Ember have accepted P2, and Devon has accepted P3. - P2: 112 points for me. Accepted by Casey, Ember. Need Avery, Devon, Blake. But Avery is on P1, Devon on P3. - P3: 165 points for me. Accepted by Devon. Need others. - P4: same as P3? Wait, the mediator's state says P3 and P4 are the same? Let me check. The "received" array has [[3,3,3,1], [2,3,0,1], [2,3,0,1]]. Wait, maybe the numbers correspond to the parties' scores. But I'm getting confused. Let me focus on my own points. I need to choose between P1, P2, P3, or P4. Since I have already accepted P1 and P2 (wait, no, in the previous messages, I proposed P1 and then accepted P1, and in the current state, P1 is accepted by Avery and Blake. But in the last round, I had accepted P1, but others are on different offers. But now, the standing offer is P4. Wait, the mediator says "standing": "P4". So P4 is the current standing offer. But the problem is that the standing offer is the one that's being pushed for closure. Wait, the user's last message shows that the Mediator's state has "standing": "P4". So P4 is the current standing offer. But P4's details are same as P3? Because in the offers, P3 and P4 have same details. Let me check the mediator's data: The offers are: P1: Location=Kestrel Park, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=eighteen months, Hiring=union hall referral — 165 points. Accepted by Avery and Blake. P2: Location=We

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[18] Casey — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P2

💬 I support P2. Let's secure Blake's acceptance to finalize.

P1 scores 32 (below threshold), P2 scores 56+32=88 (above threshold). P2 has Casey and Ember's acceptance. Need Blake and Devon to accept P2 to meet quorum. Blake's acceptance is critical.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[19] Devon — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3

💬 I accept P3 to finalize the deal and meet my threshold.

P1 is below my threshold. P3/P4 meet my 143 points. Need to push for closure on P3/P4.

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[20] Avery — final_proposal (round 5)

PROPOSE {"Location": "Kestrel Park", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "three years", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, the negotiation is at the final stage, and I'm Avery. The Mediator says that I need to make my FINAL move: either propose one last deal or walk. Let me check the current state of the offers. Looking at the live offers: - P1: Location Kestrel Park (55), Power shared substation (45), Build schedule eighteen months (32), Hiring union hall referral (0). Total for me is 55+45+32+0 = 132. My threshold is 112, so this is above. It's accepted by Avery and Blake. But Casey and Ember accepted P2, and Devon accepted P3 and P4. Wait, but Blake is the veto party, so the deal needs all veto parties (just Blake here) to accept. Wait, the rules say Blake has a veto, so no deal passes without him. But in the current state, P1 has Blake's acceptance, so maybe that's okay. But the other offers? Wait, the Mediator's message says that P1 is accepted by Avery and Blake. So Blake has accepted P1. But the other offers: P2 is accepted by Casey and Ember. P3 and P4 by Devon. But since Blake is the only veto party, and he has accepted P1, then P1 could be a valid deal if others accept. But the problem is that the other parties have accepted different offers. Wait, the rules say that a deal closes when at least 5 of the original 5 parties have accepted the SAME standing offer. Wait, but there are only 5 parties. So for a deal to close, all parties must accept the same offer. Wait, no: "A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer." So since there are exactly 5 parties, it needs all 5 to accept the same offer. But currently, P1 has Avery and Blake accepting. P2 has Casey and Ember. P3 and P4 have Devon. So none of the offers have all 5 parties accepting. Therefore, the deals are still open. But the Mediator says that the rounds are over, and Avery must make the final move. So I need to either propose a new deal or walk. If I walk, then the no-deal outcome happens. But maybe I can propose a new deal that can get the necessary acceptances. Looking at my own score sheet. My points for each option: Location: Anvil Ridge=18, Dunlow Yard=37, Kestrel Park=55, Weir Flats=0. So Kestrel Park is best for me. Power supply: shared substation is 45, which is high. Solar with storage is 15, grid tie-in 30, on-site turbines 0. Build schedule: three years is 97, which is highest. Then phased over eight years (65), eighteen months (32), five years (0). Wait, Avery's build schedule points are five years=0, three years=97, phased over eight years=65, eighteen months=32. So three years is best for me. Hiring: all options are 0 for me. So hiring doesn't matter for me. So I need to focus on Location, Power supply, and Build schedule. But the current offers have P1 with Kestrel Park, shared substation, eighteen months. But my best build schedule is three years. So maybe I can propose a deal that changes the build schedule to three years, keeping Kestrel Park and shared substation. Let me calculate the total points for that. Location: Kestrel Park (55) + Power supply: shared substation (45) + Build schedule: three years (97) + Hiring: any (since all are 0). Total would be 55 +45 +97 = 197. That's way above my threshold of 112. But I need to check if that's feasible. But the problem is that the other parties may not accept. For example, Blake's preferences: he proposed P1, which has eighteen months. But if I change the build schedule to three years, would Blake accept? Also, Casey and Devon's preferences. But since I'm the only one left to propose, maybe I can create a new offer that combines my best options and see if others can accept. Alternatively, maybe I can adjust the existing offers. But since the Mediator says that the rounds are over, and I have to make a final move. So I need to propose a new deal. Let me check the current offers again. The current offers are P1, P2, P3, P4. But maybe I can create a

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+3.35

[21] Blake — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P5

💬 P5 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.

Okay, let's see. I'm Blake, and I need to decide whether to accept or reject P5. The current situation is that P5 is the standing offer, and it's the final vote. Let me check the details. First, looking at the points for P5. The location is Kestrel Park, which I value at 53. Power supply is shared substation, worth 27. Build schedule is three years, which I have a value of 0. Hiring is union hall referral, worth 85. Adding those up: 53 + 27 + 0 + 85 = 165. My threshold is 93, so 165 is way above that. So the score is acceptable. Now, the acceptance status. The offer P5 is accepted by Avery, and the others are pending. Wait, the live offers show P5 is accepted by Avery. But the negotiation state says P5 has acceptors [0], which might be a typo. Wait, the user message says "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P5." So it's the last chance to accept or reject. Looking at the current acceptances: P1 has Avery and Blake (accepted by 2 parties?), P2 has Casey, Ember, and maybe others. But the key is that for P5, the acceptors are Avery. Wait, the negotiation_state says "offer_accepts": {"P5": [0]}, which might mean Avery (seat 0?) has accepted it. But I need to check the current status. Wait, the Mediator's message says: "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P5." So the current standing offer is P5. The previous actions show that Avery proposed P5, and it's now being voted on. The current acceptances for P5 are from Avery, and perhaps others? Let me check the "offer_accepts" in the negotiation_state. It says "P5": [0], which might mean that Avery (seat 0) has accepted it. But the other parties need to accept as well. But the problem is that the deal closes only when all parties have accepted the same offer. Since Blake is the veto party, and the others have accepted different offers, but now the final vote is on P5. Let me check the current acceptances: Looking at the "offer_accepts" in the negotiation_state: - P1: [1, 0] – maybe Avery (seat 0) and Blake (seat 1) have accepted? - P2: [4, 2] – maybe others? - P3: [3] - P4: [3] - P5: [0] But the Mediator's message says "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P5." So the current standing offer is P5, and the final decision is to accept or reject it. Since my score for P5 is 165, which is above my threshold of 93, I should accept it. But I need to check if the other parties have accepted it. The current acceptors for P5 are Avery (seat 0), and perhaps others? The "offer_accepts" for P5 is [0], which might mean only Avery has accepted it. But the other parties (Casey, Devon, Ember) have accepted other offers. However, the deal requires all parties to accept the same offer. Wait, the problem is that the current standing offer is P5, but not all parties have accepted it. However, since it's the final vote, maybe the remaining parties need to accept or reject. Since Blake is the veto party, and the others have already accepted different offers, but the final vote is on P5. Wait, the Mediator's message says "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P5." So the current standing offer is P5, and the remaining parties (Casey, Devon, Ember, Avery) need to decide. But Avery has already accepted P5. Wait, no, the user's last message shows that Avery proposed P5, and the current acceptances for P5 are [0], which is Avery. So Blake is the only one left to accept or reject. Wait, but the "must_vote": true indicates that Blake needs to vote. Since Blake is the veto party, and if Blake accepts, then the deal closes. Let me check the current acceptances. The current offers: - P1: accepted by Avery and Blake (if the [1,0] means Blake (seat 1) and Avery (seat 0) have accepted) - P2: accepted by Casey (seat 2?), Ember (seat 4?), and others? - P3: accepted by Devon (seat 3) - P4: same as P3 - P5: accepted by Avery (seat 0) But the deal requires all

oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[22] Casey — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P5

💬 I accept P5 to secure quorum, despite it being below my threshold.

P5 scores 32 (below threshold). P2 scores 88 (above threshold) but needs Blake's acceptance. Blake has accepted P5. Rejecting P5 risks no deal. Accepting P5 is suboptimal but necessary to meet quorum.

oracle regret: threshold=+56, acceptance=+56, bestresponse=+0

[23] Devon — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P5

💬 I accept P5 to support closing the deal and meet my threshold.

P5 scores 120 (above my threshold). Accepting secures my support and moves toward closure. Ember's acceptance is still needed, but finalizing now is prudent.

oracle regret: threshold=+23, acceptance=+23, bestresponse=+0

[24] Ember — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P5

💬 P5 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.

Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Ember, and the final round is happening. The live offers are P1 to P5. Let me check the details again. First, the Mediator's message says that P5 is the final up/down vote. The current state: P5 has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, and Devon. That's four parties. But the quorum is 5, including Blake as the veto party. Wait, Blake is already accepting P5, right? So the accepted parties for P5 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. That's four. So we need one more acceptance. But the parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, and Ember. So Ember hasn't accepted yet. Wait, but the Mediator's message says "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P5." So maybe the previous actions have already led to P5 being the standing offer, and now it's Ember's turn to decide. Looking at the scores for P5 from my perspective. The Mediator says P5 gives me 148 total, which is above my threshold of 129. So accepting P5 would be good for me. But I need to check if there's any reason not to. The build schedule for P5 is three years, which in my score sheet for Build schedule, all options are worth 0. So that's neutral. The Hiring is union hall referral, which I value at 97. Power supply is shared substation (51), and Location is Kestrel Park (0). So total is 0+51+0+97=148. That's correct. So accepting P5 is above my threshold. But wait, the problem is that the deal needs all 5 parties to accept the same offer. Currently, P5 has been accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. Ember is the only one left. So if I accept P5, then all 5 parties would have accepted, and the deal closes. But Blake is the veto party, and since he's already accepted, the deal can pass. But why is the Mediator saying it's the final up/down vote on P5? Maybe because the previous rounds had other offers, but now it's down to P5. So my action now is to accept P5 to close the deal. Alternatively, if I reject, then maybe the deal fails, but since Blake is already on board, and others have accepted, maybe the deal can still pass with my acceptance. Wait, the rules say that a deal closes when at least 5 parties (including veto) have accepted the same offer. Since Blake is the veto party, and he's already accepted P5, and others have accepted, if I accept, then it's 5 parties. So I should accept P5. But the Mediator's message says that the deadline is round 4, and this is round 5. Wait, the initial setup said there are 4 rounds of turns. But the current round is 5? Maybe a miscalculation. Anyway, the Mediator's message says it's the final up/down vote on P5, so I need to act now. So the correct action is to accept P5. That would make all 5 parties accept, and the deal closes. Since my score for P5 is 148, which is above my threshold, I should accept. Alternatively, is there any reason not to? Maybe if other offers are better, but the Mediator says this is the final vote on P5, so other offers are not in play anymore. So I should accept P5.

oracle regret: threshold=+91, acceptance=+91, bestresponse=+27.5

Outcome

deal:

{"Location": "Kestrel Park", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Build schedule": "three years", "Hiring": "union hall referral"}

(closed by consensus)

primary 0.9453 · USW 198.0 · ESW -19.0 · NSW 0.0 · Gini 0.3563 · per-party surplus [85.0, 72.0, -19.0, 41.0, 19.0]

scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-bba38bf4b6

Game setup

Turns

[0] Blake — turn (round 1)

[1] Casey — turn (round 1)

[2] Devon — turn (round 1)

[3] Ember — turn (round 1)

[4] Avery — turn (round 1)

[5] Casey — turn (round 2)

[6] Devon — turn (round 2)

[7] Ember — turn (round 2)

[8] Avery — turn (round 2)

[9] Blake — turn (round 2)

[10] Devon — turn (round 3)

[11] Ember — turn (round 3)

[12] Avery — turn (round 3)

[13] Blake — turn (round 3)

[14] Casey — turn (round 3)

[15] Ember — turn (round 4)

[16] Avery — turn (round 4)

[17] Blake — turn (round 4)

[18] Casey — turn (round 4)

[19] Devon — turn (round 4)

[20] Avery — final_proposal (round 5)

[21] Blake — final_vote (round 5)

[22] Casey — final_vote (round 5)

[23] Devon — final_vote (round 5)

[24] Ember — final_vote (round 5)

Outcome

scorable_negotiation `scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-bba38bf4b6`