scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-d41ba12d53

model Qwen3-8B · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L0-a483b0d80d · seed 1 · status done · {"cell": "five_seat_robustness__qwen_datacenter__all_llm", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "qwen_datacenter", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5", "framing": "datacenter", "framing_map": {"framing": "datacenter", "title": "Northgate data-centre siting agreement", "issue_names": ["Build schedule", "Site access", "Power supply", "Compensation"], "option_labels": [["five years", "phased over eight years", "eighteen months", "three years"], ["widened lane", "new spur road", "existing haul route", "rail siding"], ["on-site turbines", "shared substation", "solar with storage", "grid tie-in"], ["in-kind infrastructure", "rates abatement", "annual community fund", "one-off site payment"]], "party_roles": ["Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)", "Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)", "Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)", "Northgate Borough Council (the elected local authority)", "Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)"]}}

Game setup

Turns

[0] Blake — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "phased over eight years", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "grid tie-in", "Compensation": "in-kind infrastructure"}
💬 I propose a deal with in-kind infrastructure compensation and neutral terms on other issues.
My compensation threshold is 40. Only in-kind infrastructure meets this. Other issues don't affect my score, so I'll set them to neutral options.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+2.75

[1] Casey — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept to advance the agreement.
P1 scores 95, above my threshold. Accepting helps move the deal forward with Blake's support.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+27.7, bestresponse=+0

[2] Devon — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my requirements. I accept to support progress.
P1 scores 117, above my threshold. Accepting now to move agreement forward.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[3] Ember — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "three years", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "annual community fund"}
💬 P1 is too low. I propose a revised deal with annual community fund and shared substation.
P1 scores 8, below my threshold. Need to propose a better deal with higher compensation and power supply.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0.6

[4] Avery — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to advance the agreement.
P2 scores 125 (above threshold). Accepting it pushes the deal forward; Blake may follow.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[5] Casey — turn (round 2)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "phased over eight years", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "in-kind infrastructure"}
💬 I propose a revised deal with shared substation, phased schedule, and in-kind compensation to meet my threshold and secure necessary acceptances.
P2 has 76 points (above threshold) but lacks Blake's acceptance. P1 has 95 but needs Avery and Ember. Combining shared substation (58) with phased schedule (9) and in-kind (57) gives 124. But need to address Avery and Ember's concerns.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+3.5

[6] Devon — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P3
💬 P3 meets my threshold. I accept to move forward.
P1 has 117 points (threshold 65), accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon. Needs Avery and Ember. P3 has same score, accepted by Casey. Accepting P1 would push closure if others accept. But standing offer is P3; better to accept P3 to advance.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[7] Ember — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 is viable but requires Blake's acceptance. I'll support it to advance the agreement.
P2 meets my threshold but needs Blake's acceptance. Since Blake is a veto party, I must secure their approval. My best option is to support P2 and push for Blake's acceptance.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[8] Avery — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I'll accept to push for Blake's approval.
P2 scores 125 (above threshold) and has Ember's support. Need Blake's acceptance to close deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[9] Blake — turn (round 2)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the agreement.
P1 scores 61 (above threshold), accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon. Need Avery and Ember to accept. P2 is below my threshold. P3 is same as P1 but needs more acceptors. Accepting P1 pushes the deal forward.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+10.1, bestresponse=+0

[10] Devon — turn (round 3)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "grid tie-in", "Compensation": "in-kind infrastructure"}
💬 I propose a revised deal with an accelerated build schedule to maximize community benefit.
Proposing a deal with eighteen months build schedule (54), rail siding (59), grid tie-in (0), in-kind (40) for total 153. This exceeds my threshold and improves on P3's 117.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+10.1, bestresponse=+4.4

[11] Ember — turn (round 3)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "three years", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "annual community fund"}
💬 P2 is viable but needs broader support. I'll adjust compensation to secure necessary votes.
P2 scores 144 (above threshold) but needs Blake, Casey, and Devon to accept. Blake is on P1; others are split. I can't unilaterally push without their support. Proposing a revised P2 with higher compensation might attract Casey and Devon.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+34.4, bestresponse=+0.6

[12] Avery — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P2
Okay, let's see. I'm Avery, and I need to decide what to do on my turn. The current live offers are P1 to P5. My acceptance threshold is 63 points. Let me check each offer's total for me. P1: 53 points. That's below my threshold. So I can't accept that. But it's already accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon. But Blake is the veto party, so even if others accept, without Blake's acceptance, the deal can't pass. Wait, but Blake already accepted P1. Wait, in the previous messages, Blake accepted P1. But then there's P2, which has 125 points for me. Wait, no, the Mediator's state shows P2's total as 125. Wait, let me check again. Wait, the Mediator's state lists the offers. For P1: Build schedule phased over eight years (11), Site access rail siding (42), Power supply grid tie-in (0), Compensation in-kind (0). Total 11+42+0+0=53. Which is below my threshold. But the user says that P2 is Build schedule three years (21), Site access rail siding (42), Power supply shared substation (0), Compensation annual community fund (62). Total 21+42+0+62=125. That's above my threshold. So P2 is good for me. But P2 is accepted by Avery and Ember. Wait, but the current round is Round 3, and it's my turn. Wait, the current offers on the table are P1 to P5. Let me check which ones are active. The Mediator's state shows that P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 are all live. But the problem is that Blake is the veto party. So even if a deal has enough acceptances, if Blake hasn't accepted, it can't pass. Let me check the acceptances. Looking at the "offer_accepts" in the Mediator's state: - P1 is accepted by [3,1,2], which are Casey, Blake, Devon. So Blake has accepted P1. But then, the deal requires all parties to accept. Wait, but Blake is the veto party. So if Blake accepts, then the deal can pass. But the problem is that other parties may not have accepted. Wait, the current status of P1 is accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon. But Avery and Ember have not accepted P1. But the Mediator's state shows that P2 is accepted by Avery and Ember. So P2 has two acceptances. But Blake hasn't accepted P2 yet. But the current round is Round 3, and it's my turn. The previous actions: In the last round, Blake accepted P1. Then Devon proposed P4, which is Build schedule eighteen months, etc. Ember proposed P5. Now, the Mediator's state shows that P5 is the standing offer. Wait, the Mediator's state says "standing": "P5". So maybe the current focus is on P5. But my task is to decide my action. Since it's my turn, I need to either accept an offer, reject, propose a new one, or walk. Looking at my own scores. Let me check each offer's total for me: P1: 53 (below threshold) P2: 125 (above) P3: 53 (same as P1) P4: 74 (which is 32+42+0+0=74, since Build schedule is eighteen months (32), Site access rail siding (42), Power supply grid tie-in (0), Compensation in-kind (0). So total 74. That's above my threshold. So P4 is acceptable. But P4 is accepted by Devon only. P5: same as P2? Let me check. P5 is Build schedule three years (21), Site access rail siding (42), Power supply shared substation (0), Compensation annual community fund (62). Total 21+42+0+62=125. So same as P2. P5 is accepted by Ember. So for me, P2, P4, and P5 are above my threshold. But the problem is that Blake is the veto party. So for any deal to pass, Blake must accept. Let's check which offers Blake has accepted. In the Mediator's state, the "offer_accepts" for P1 includes Blake (1). For P2, the acceptances are Avery (0) and Ember (4). So Blake hasn't accepted P2. Similarly, P4 and P5 are not accepted by Blake.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[13] Blake — turn (round 3)

ACCEPT P1
💬 I accept P1 to advance the agreement and secure necessary support.
P1 has 61 points (above threshold), with three acceptances. Need Avery and Ember to accept. P4 has 95 points but only Devon accepted. I can accept P1 to push for final approval.
oracle regret: threshold=+34, acceptance=+34, bestresponse=+0

[14] Casey — turn (round 3)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "phased over eight years", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "in-kind infrastructure"}
💬 I propose P3 with shared substation and in-kind compensation to secure full support.
P3 scores 124, needs Blake, Avery, and Ember. P1 has Blake, Casey, Devon but needs Avery and Ember. P2 has Avery, Ember but needs Blake. P4 and P5 are lower. Best to push P3 with Blake.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+1.32, bestresponse=+3.5

[15] Ember — turn (round 4)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "annual community fund"}
💬 I propose a deal with an 18-month build schedule, shared substation, and annual community fund to ensure a strong, viable agreement.
P2 and P5 have high scores but need broader acceptance. Proposing a better package with 18-month schedule, shared substation, and annual fund to meet my threshold and secure support.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+34.4, bestresponse=+0.6

[16] Avery — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P7
💬 P7 meets my threshold. I accept to secure final approval.
P7 scores 136 (above threshold) and needs Blake's acceptance. Accepting P7 adds my support, pushing for Blake's approval.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[17] Blake — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P1
💬 I accept P1 to finalize the agreement and secure necessary support.
P1 meets my threshold and has strong support. Accepting it will push for final approval.
oracle regret: threshold=+34, acceptance=+34, bestresponse=+0

[18] Casey — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P3
💬 I'll accept P3 to advance the agreement and secure necessary support.
P3 has my support and Devon's. Need Blake, Avery, Ember to accept. Blake is a veto; must secure his acceptance.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[19] Devon — turn (round 4)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold and has Blake's acceptance. I'll accept to finalize the agreement.
P1 has Blake, Casey, and Devon accepting. Need Avery and Ember to accept. P7 has Avery and Ember accepting but needs Blake. P4 is only accepted by me. P3 needs Blake and Avery. P2 needs Blake. P6 needs Blake and Avery. P7 needs Blake. Best to push for P1 with Blake's acceptance and secure remaining parties.
oracle regret: threshold=+36, acceptance=+36, bestresponse=+0

[20] Avery — final_proposal (round 5)

PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "annual community fund"}
Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, the situation is that we're at the final stage of the negotiations. Avery is the Regional Grid Authority, and the goal is to reach a binding agreement on building the data center at Northgate. The problem is that there are multiple offers on the table, but none have secured the necessary acceptances, especially considering Blake's veto. First, I need to recall the current state of the offers. The Mediator has listed several live offers (P1 to P7), each with different combinations of the four issues: Build schedule, Site access, Power supply, and Compensation. Each offer has a total score for Avery, based on their secret score sheet. Avery's acceptance threshold is 63 points. Looking at the offers: - P1: Total 53 (below threshold) - P2: Total 125 (above threshold) - P3: Total 53 (below) - P4: Total 74 (above) - P5: Total 125 (above) - P6: Total 53 (below) - P7: Total 136 (above) So, Avery's threshold is 63. Offers P2, P4, P5, and P7 are above that. But the problem is that even though Avery might accept some of these, we need Blake's acceptance since Blake is the veto party. Blake hasn't accepted any of the offers yet. Looking at the current acceptances: - P1 is accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon (but Avery isn't) - P2 is accepted by Avery and Ember - P3 is accepted by Casey and Devon - P4 is accepted by Devon - P5 is accepted by Ember - P6 is accepted by Casey - P7 is accepted by Avery and Ember So, for a deal to pass, all five parties must accept the same offer. Since Blake is a veto party, the deal can't pass unless Blake accepts. Now, the current offers that have Avery's acceptance are P2, P4, P5, P7. However, Blake hasn't accepted any of them. So the only way to get a deal through is to get Blake to accept one of these offers. Looking at the offers that have Avery's acceptance: - P2: Build schedule=three years (21), Site access=rail siding (42), Power supply=shared substation (0), Compensation=annual community fund (62). Total 125. Accepted by Avery and Ember. Needs Blake, Casey, Devon to accept. - P4: Build schedule=eighteen months (32), Site access=rail siding (42), Power supply=grid tie-in (0), Compensation=in-kind infrastructure (0). Total 74. Accepted by Devon. Needs others. - P5: Same as P2 but accepted by Ember. Needs others. - P7: Build schedule=eighteen months (32), Site access=rail siding (42), Power supply=shared substation (0), Compensation=annual community fund (62). Total 136. Accepted by Avery and Ember. Needs others. But Blake hasn't accepted any. So, the question is: which offer can Blake accept? Blake's score sheet isn't known to me, but I know that Blake is the veto party and needs to accept. Since the previous attempts to get Blake to accept have failed, maybe I need to propose a new offer that Blake would find acceptable. Alternatively, since the Mediator is giving Avery a final move to either propose one last deal or walk, maybe Avery can propose a new deal that combines the best elements to meet Blake's needs. Looking at Avery's own scores, the highest value for Compensation is annual community fund (62), followed by rates abatement (41), then one-off site payment (21), and in-kind infrastructure (0). So, Avery would prefer the annual community fund. For Power supply, Avery's score is 0 for all options, so they don't care. For Site access, rail siding is 42, which is the highest. For Build schedule, the highest is eighteen months (32), then three years (21), then phased over eight years (11), and five years (0). So, Avery's ideal deal would be Build schedule=eighteen months, Site access=rail siding, Power supply=shared substation (since they don't care), Compensation=annual community fund. That's exactly P7. But P7 is already on the table and accepted by Avery and Ember. However, it's not accepted by Blake, Casey, or Devon. But if Avery proposes P7 again, maybe Blake would accept it. However, the problem is that the current offers are already on the table. The Mediator says that Avery can either propose a
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+27, bestresponse=+0.55

[21] Blake — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P8
💬 P8 meets my threshold and secures necessary support. I accept to finalize the agreement.
Okay, let's see what's going on here. I'm Blake, and I need to decide on my action for the final vote on P8. The mediator says this is the last chance to vote on P8. Let me check the details. First, looking at the live offers, P8 is the standing offer. The details for P8 are: Build schedule is eighteen months (which I value at 51 points), Site access is rail siding (0 points), Power supply is shared substation (0 points), and Compensation is annual community fund (0 points). So my total score for P8 is 51, which is above my threshold of 40. That means accepting P8 is good for me. Now, the current acceptances for P8 are from Avery and Ember. The required number of acceptances is 5, including all veto parties. Since Blake is the veto party, I need to accept P8 to meet the quorum. Wait, the current acceptances for P8 are Avery and Ember. Let me check the offer_accepts: P8 is accepted by [0, 4], which I think refers to the proposers or the parties. Wait, maybe the offer_accepts list shows which parties have accepted. The "offer_accepts" for P8 is [0, 4], which might mean Avery (0?) and Ember (4)? Wait, the parties are Avery (0?), Blake (1?), Casey (2?), Devon (3?), Ember (4?). So if P8 is accepted by Avery (0) and Ember (4), then we need three more acceptances. But the current acceptances are Avery, Ember, and maybe others? Wait, looking back at the previous messages, in the last round, Avery and Ember accepted P7, but now P8 is the standing offer. Wait, the current state says that P8 is the standing offer, and the offer_accepts for P8 are [0, 4], which would be Avery and Ember. So currently, two acceptances. The quorum is 5 parties, so we need three more. But Blake is the veto party, so if I accept, that would make three acceptances (Avery, Ember, Blake). But we need all five parties? Wait, the original parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. The quorum is 5 of the original 5. So all five must accept the same offer. But the current acceptances for P8 are Avery, Ember, and maybe others? Wait, the "offer_accepts" for P8 is [0, 4], which are Avery and Ember. So two acceptances. So if I accept, that's three. Then we need Casey and Devon to accept as well. But in the previous messages, Casey and Devon have accepted other offers. Wait, the current state shows that P1 is accepted by Blake, Casey, Devon. P3 is accepted by Casey and Devon. So maybe Casey and Devon are already on board with P1 or P3, but the standing offer is P8. So if I accept P8, then the acceptances would be Avery, Ember, Blake. Then Casey and Devon need to accept P8 as well. But the problem is that the other parties might not have accepted P8 yet. Wait, the current standing offer is P8. The question is whether I should accept P8 to push it to closure. Since I have a surplus of 11 points (51 total, threshold 40), it's in my interest to accept. But the deal can't close unless all parties accept. However, since Blake is the veto party, and the quorum is 5, but the current acceptances for P8 are Avery and Ember. If I accept, then we have three acceptances (Avery, Ember, Blake). Then Casey and Devon need to accept. But the problem is that Casey and Devon might not have accepted P8 yet. However, in the previous rounds, Casey and Devon had accepted other offers. But the system allows for them to switch. However, the current round is the final up/down vote on P8. So the only action I can take is to accept or reject P8. If I accept P8, then the acceptances are Avery, Ember, Blake. Then Casey and Devon might still need to accept. But since this is the final round, maybe the other parties are already committed. Wait, the mediator says it's the final up/down vote on P8. So the other parties might have already made their decisions. But according to the current state, the offer_accepts for P8 are Avery and Ember. So if I accept, that's three. Then maybe the other parties have already accepted. Wait, the negotiation_state has "received" which includes the scores of each party. Let me check the "received" array. The received array has the scores of each party for each offer. For
oracle regret: threshold=+44, acceptance=+44, bestresponse=+0

[22] Casey — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P8
💬 P8 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the agreement.
P8 scores 84 (above threshold). Blake and Avery have accepted. Accepting P8 secures my support and moves deal forward.
oracle regret: threshold=+40, acceptance=+40, bestresponse=+0

[23] Devon — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P8
Okay, let's break this down. I'm Devon, and it's my turn in the final round. The mediator says this is the final up/down vote on P8. Let me check the details of P8. P8 has a build schedule of eighteen months (which I value at 54 points), site access as rail siding (59 points), power supply as shared substation (0 points), and compensation as annual community fund (0 points). My total is 54 + 59 + 0 + 0 = 113 points. My threshold is 65, so 113 is well above that. Looking at the current acceptances for P8: it's accepted by Avery, Blake, and Casey. The required quorum is 5 parties, but Blake is the veto party. Wait, the protocol says that a deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) have accepted the same offer. Since Blake is the veto party, their acceptance is crucial. Currently, P8 has acceptances from Avery (A), Blake (B), Casey (C), and Devon (D). That's four parties. We need one more. The remaining party is Ember. But looking at the live offers, Ember has accepted P2 and P5, but not P8. However, the mediator's message says this is the final vote on P8, so maybe Ember hasn't accepted yet. Wait, the "offer_accepts" for P8 are [1, 0, 2], which might correspond to the parties. Let me check the parties again. The parties are Avery (0?), Blake (1?), Casey (2?), Devon (3?), Ember (4?). Wait, the "offer_accepts" for P8 are [1, 0, 2], which might mean Avery (0?), Blake (1?), Casey (2?), Devon (3?), Ember (4?). Wait, the "offer_accepts" field shows for P8: [1, 0, 2]. That might be the list of parties who accepted. But I need to check which parties have accepted. Looking at the "offer_accepts" for P8: [1, 0, 2]. If the indices are 0-based for the parties (Avery=0, Blake=1, Casey=2, Devon=3, Ember=4), then P8 has been accepted by Blake (1), Avery (0), and Casey (2). Wait, but in the live offers description, it says P8 is accepted by Avery, Blake, and Casey. So that's three parties. We need two more: Devon and Ember. Wait, but Devon is the one acting now. Wait, the user is Devon, and the current state says that P8 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. So three parties. We need two more acceptances to reach five. But since Blake is the veto party, and they've already accepted, the remaining parties are Devon and Ember. But the current state shows that Devon hasn't accepted yet. Wait, looking back, in the live offers on the table, P8 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey. So three parties. The required quorum is five. Therefore, I (Devon) and Ember need to accept. However, the mediator's message says "This is the FINAL up/down vote on P8." So maybe the system is expecting me to accept or reject. But wait, the "must_vote": true suggests that I need to take an action. Since my score for P8 is 113, which is above my threshold of 65, I should accept it. If I accept, then P8 would have four acceptances (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon). Then Ember needs to accept as well. But if Ember hasn't accepted yet, maybe they can still accept. However, the mediator's message says this is the final vote, implying that the next step is to accept or reject. Alternatively, maybe the system is designed such that once the final vote is called, the remaining parties can still accept. But given that it's the final round, and I'm the one to act now, I should accept P8 to move towards closure. If I accept, then with Avery, Blake, Casey, and Devon, that's four. If Ember hasn't accepted, but the deal requires five, then maybe the system will proceed. However, the rules state that a deal closes when all five parties have accepted the same offer. Since Blake is a veto party, and they've already accepted, the others need to accept. But since this is the final round, and the user is Devon, I need to decide whether to accept or reject. Since my score is 113, which is well above my threshold, I should accept. If I accept, then the offer will have four
oracle regret: threshold=+40, acceptance=+40, bestresponse=+35.6

[24] Ember — final_vote (round 5)

ACCEPT P8
💬 P8 meets my threshold and secures all necessary acceptances. I accept to finalize the agreement.
Okay, let me try to figure out what to do here. So, I'm Ember, and it's my turn in the final round. The live offers on the table include P8, which has my acceptance threshold met. Let me check the details. P8 has a build schedule of eighteen months (25 points), site access as rail siding (0), power supply as shared substation (50), and compensation as annual community fund (78). That totals 25 + 0 + 50 + 78 = 153 points. My threshold is 63, so that's way above. The offer is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, and Devon. The only one left is me, Ember. Wait, the mediator says this is the final up/down vote on P8. So I need to decide whether to accept or reject. Since the deal meets my threshold, I should accept it. But wait, Blake is the veto party. Let me check if all veto parties have accepted. The veto party is Blake. The offer P8 is accepted by Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, and me. Wait, the current acceptors for P8 are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon. If I accept, then all parties except maybe someone else? Wait, the parties are Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember. So if I accept P8, then all five parties have accepted. But Blake is the veto party, so the deal can pass only if they accept. Since Blake has already accepted P8, then with my acceptance, all are on board. So the action here is to accept P8. The mediator's message says it's the final vote, so I need to accept to close the deal. Otherwise, if I reject, the deal fails. Since the deal is good for me, I should accept.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

Outcome

deal: {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "rail siding", "Power supply": "shared substation", "Compensation": "annual community fund"} (closed by consensus)

primary 0.896 · USW 235.0 · ESW 11.0 · NSW 45096480.0 · Gini 0.3711 · per-party surplus [73.0, 11.0, 13.0, 48.0, 90.0]