scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-ee19b7eea8
model Qwen3-8B · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L0-a483b0d80d · seed 0 · status done · {"cell": "five_seat_robustness__qwen_datacenter__all_llm", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "qwen_datacenter", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5", "framing": "datacenter", "framing_map": {"framing": "datacenter", "title": "Northgate data-centre siting agreement", "issue_names": ["Build schedule", "Site access", "Power supply", "Compensation"], "option_labels": [["five years", "phased over eight years", "eighteen months", "three years"], ["widened lane", "new spur road", "existing haul route", "rail siding"], ["on-site turbines", "shared substation", "solar with storage", "grid tie-in"], ["in-kind infrastructure", "rates abatement", "annual community fund", "one-off site payment"]], "party_roles": ["Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)", "Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)", "Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)", "Northgate Borough Council (the elected local authority)", "Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)"]}}
Game setup
- Issues: Build schedule (five years, phased over eight years, eighteen months, three years); Site access (widened lane, new spur road, existing haul route, rail siding); Power supply (on-site turbines, shared substation, solar with storage, grid tie-in); Compensation (in-kind infrastructure, rates abatement, annual community fund, one-off site payment)
- Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections) (τ=63): Build schedule: five years=0, phased over eight years=11, eighteen months=32, three years=21; Site access: widened lane=21, new spur road=0, existing haul route=63, rail siding=42; Power supply: on-site turbines=0, shared substation=0, solar with storage=0, grid tie-in=0; Compensation: in-kind infrastructure=0, rates abatement=41, annual community fund=62, one-off site payment=21
- Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (τ=40): Build schedule: five years=0, phased over eight years=17, eighteen months=51, three years=34; Site access: widened lane=0, new spur road=0, existing haul route=0, rail siding=0; Power supply: on-site turbines=0, shared substation=0, solar with storage=0, grid tie-in=0; Compensation: in-kind infrastructure=44, rates abatement=15, annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=29
- Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility) (τ=71): Build schedule: five years=0, phased over eight years=9, eighteen months=26, three years=18; Site access: widened lane=0, new spur road=0, existing haul route=0, rail siding=0; Power supply: on-site turbines=0, shared substation=58, solar with storage=87, grid tie-in=29; Compensation: in-kind infrastructure=57, rates abatement=19, annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=38
- Northgate Borough Council (the elected local authority) (τ=65): Build schedule: five years=0, phased over eight years=18, eighteen months=54, three years=36; Site access: widened lane=0, new spur road=39, existing haul route=20, rail siding=59; Power supply: on-site turbines=0, shared substation=0, solar with storage=0, grid tie-in=0; Compensation: in-kind infrastructure=40, rates abatement=13, annual community fund=0, one-off site payment=27
- Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (τ=63): Build schedule: five years=0, phased over eight years=8, eighteen months=25, three years=16; Site access: widened lane=0, new spur road=0, existing haul route=0, rail siding=0; Power supply: on-site turbines=17, shared substation=50, solar with storage=33, grid tie-in=0; Compensation: in-kind infrastructure=0, rates abatement=52, annual community fund=78, one-off site payment=26
Turns
[0] Avery — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "existing haul route", "Power supply": "grid tie-in", "Compensation": "annual community fund"}
💬 I propose a deal with existing haul route for site access, annual community fund for compensation, eighteen-month build schedule, and any power supply option. This meets my threshold.
Maximizing my points: Site access (63) + Compensation (62) + Build schedule (32) = 157. Power supply is neutral. This meets my threshold.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0.55
[1] Blake — turn (round 1)
ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 scores 51 for me—above threshold. I accept.
P1 meets my threshold (51 points). Accepting ensures progress.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+20.1, bestresponse=+0
[2] Casey — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "existing haul route", "Power supply": "solar with storage", "Compensation": "one-off site payment"}
💬 I propose a better deal with solar power and one-off payment to meet my threshold.
P1 scores 55 below threshold. Need to boost power supply and compensation.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+3.5
[3] Devon — turn (round 1)
ACCEPT P2
💬 I accept P2, which meets my threshold and aligns with my priorities. Let’s secure this deal.
P2 scores 101 for me. Accepting it would bring total acceptors to Casey and me, but Blake may reject. Proposing a better deal with rail siding (59) could increase my score further, but risks rejection. Alternatively, accept P2 and push for Blake's acceptance.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+5.95, bestresponse=+0
[4] Ember — turn (round 1)
ACCEPT P2
💬 I accept P2 to push for a deal, but need Blake's acceptance. However, since Blake is already on P1, maybe they can't switch. Alternatively, propose a new deal with better power supply.
P1 has Blake's acceptance but needs others. P2 needs Blake's acceptance. My score for P2 is 84, above threshold. If I accept P2, and others accept, but Blake must accept. Since Blake is already on P1, maybe they can switch? But no, they can't. So P2 needs Blake's acceptance. Alternatively, I can propose a new deal that might be better for Blake.
oracle regret: threshold=+19, acceptance=+25.6, bestresponse=+0
[5] Blake — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P2
💬 I accept P2 to close the deal and meet my threshold.
P2 scores 80, well above my threshold. I can accept P2 to finalize the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+12.2
[6] Casey — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 has four acceptances. I'll push for Avery to accept to finalize the deal.
P2 is already accepted by 4 parties, including Blake. Only Avery remains. I need to ensure Avery accepts P2 to close the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0
[7] Devon — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.
P2 has four acceptances. Need Avery to accept to close the deal. P2 scores 101 for me, above threshold. I'll accept P2 to push for finalization.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+5.95, bestresponse=+47.6
[8] Ember — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 is nearly closed. I'll accept to push for Avery's final approval.
P2 has 4 acceptances (Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember). Only Avery remains. Need to secure Avery's acceptance to close the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+19, acceptance=+25.6, bestresponse=+0
[9] Avery — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P2
💬 P2 meets my threshold. I accept to finalize the deal.
P2 has 4 acceptances. Accepting it meets my threshold (116 > 63) and closes the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+41, acceptance=+41, bestresponse=+0
Outcome
deal: {"Build schedule": "eighteen months", "Site access": "existing haul route", "Power supply": "solar with storage", "Compensation": "one-off site payment"} (closed by consensus)
primary 0.9258 · USW 230.0 · ESW 21.0 · NSW 128217600.0 · Gini 0.2348 · per-party surplus [53.0, 40.0, 80.0, 36.0, 21.0]