scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-5e770cb283

model one_oracle · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L0-34733a57e6 · seed 0 · status done · {"cell": "five_seat_robustness__qwen_datacenter__one_oracle", "fill_policy": "bayes-rational", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "qwen_datacenter", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5", "framing": "datacenter", "framing_map": {"framing": "datacenter", "title": "Northgate data-centre siting agreement", "issue_names": ["Site access", "Hiring", "Location", "Power supply"], "option_labels": [["existing haul route", "rail siding", "widened lane", "new spur road"], ["local hiring pact", "apprenticeship programme", "open recruitment", "union hall referral"], ["Dunlow Yard", "Weir Flats", "Kestrel Park", "Anvil Ridge"], ["grid tie-in", "on-site turbines", "shared substation", "solar with storage"]], "party_roles": ["Northgate Borough Council (the elected local authority)", "Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)", "Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)", "Meridian Compute (the firm that would build and operate the facility)", "Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)"]}}

Game setup

Turns

[0] Avery — turn (round 1)

PROPOSE {"Site access": "existing haul route", "Hiring": "open recruitment", "Location": "Weir Flats", "Power supply": "solar with storage"}
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[1] Blake — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept.
Okay, let's see. I'm Blake, the Regional Grid Authority, and I have a veto. The current proposal P1 has Site access as existing haul route, Hiring as open recruitment, Location as Weir Flats, and Power supply as solar with storage. My scores for these options are: Site access is 0, Hiring open recruitment is 44, Location Weir Flats is 57, Power supply solar with storage is 0. Total is 44 + 57 = 101, which is above my threshold of 81. So I have a surplus of 20. But wait, the problem says that the deal must have exactly one option for each issue. The current P1 is already on the table. Since my threshold is 81 and the total here is 101, which is above, I should consider accepting this offer. However, I need to check if there are other options that might be better. But since the protocol says that the first proposer is Avery, and the current offer is P1, maybe I should accept it to move forward. But wait, the user is Blake's turn now. The mediator's state shows that P1 is the standing offer, and Avery has already accepted it. The other parties haven't accepted yet. Since Blake is a veto party, the deal can't pass unless Blake accepts. But Blake's threshold is 81, and P1 scores 101, which is above. So Blake should accept P1. Alternatively, maybe Blake can propose a better deal? Wait, no. The current proposal is P1. Blake's turn is to act. Since the deal is already on the table, and Blake's score is above threshold, the best action is to accept P1. Otherwise, if Blake rejects, the deal can't pass. But since Blake is the veto party, the deal can't pass without Blake's acceptance. So Blake needs to accept P1. So the action here is to accept P1. Let me check the mediator's state again. The offer_accepts for P1 is [0], which is Avery. So Blake needs to accept it. So the correct move is to accept P1. Therefore, the JSON should be "accept" with offer_id "P1".
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+39.2, bestresponse=+0

[2] Casey — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept.
P1 scores 121 (threshold 50). Accepting moves us closer to closure.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[3] Devon — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept to advance the agreement.
P1 scores 111, above my threshold. Accepting now pushes the deal closer to closure.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0

[4] Ember — turn (round 1)

ACCEPT P1
💬 P1 meets my threshold. I accept.
P1 meets my threshold (69). Accepting closes the deal.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+47.3, bestresponse=+0

Outcome

deal: {"Site access": "existing haul route", "Hiring": "open recruitment", "Location": "Weir Flats", "Power supply": "solar with storage"} (closed by consensus)

primary 1.0 · USW 209.0 · ESW 0.0 · NSW 0.0 · Gini 0.3617 · per-party surplus [67.0, 20.0, 71.0, 51.0, 0.0]