scorable_negotiation scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-f98521cdf8
model one_rational · arm moves_chat · instance scorable_negotiation-L3-9a1b1c0960 · seed 1 · status done · {"cell": "five_seat_robustness__opus_abstract__one_rational", "fill_policy": "bayes-rational", "robustness_schema": "five-seat-robustness-cell-v1", "robustness_condition": "opus_abstract", "source_bank_position_schedule": "treated=(source_bank_position+2*episode_seed) mod 5"}
Game setup
- Issues: issue0 (opt0, opt1, opt2, opt3); issue1 (opt0, opt1, opt2, opt3); issue2 (opt0, opt1, opt2, opt3); issue3 (opt0, opt1, opt2, opt3)
- P0 (τ=80): issue0: opt0=28, opt1=41, opt2=0, opt3=14; issue1: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue2: opt0=22, opt1=65, opt2=0, opt3=44; issue3: opt0=29, opt1=0, opt2=44, opt3=15
- P1 (τ=118): issue0: opt0=62, opt1=94, opt2=0, opt3=31; issue1: opt0=32, opt1=97, opt2=0, opt3=65; issue2: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue3: opt0=19, opt1=0, opt2=28, opt3=9
- P2 (τ=89): issue0: opt0=18, opt1=0, opt2=55, opt3=37; issue1: opt0=17, opt1=0, opt2=50, opt3=33; issue2: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue3: opt0=39, opt1=0, opt2=58, opt3=19
- P3 (τ=107): issue0: opt0=17, opt1=0, opt2=51, opt3=34; issue1: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue2: opt0=0, opt1=63, opt2=95, opt3=32; issue3: opt0=36, opt1=0, opt2=53, opt3=18
- P4 (τ=53): issue0: opt0=19, opt1=0, opt2=56, opt3=38; issue1: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue2: opt0=0, opt1=0, opt2=0, opt3=0; issue3: opt0=27, opt1=0, opt2=41, opt3=14
Turns
[0] Blake — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt1", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt0", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Good morning. Let me put a complete package up so we have something concrete to work from. Two points of transparency up front: issue2 is genuinely low-stakes for me — I will hand that issue entirely to whoever needs it most, just tell me which option and I'll write it in. Issue3 I also have some room on. Where I have very little room is issue0 and issue1; those are the ones that determine whether a deal beats no-deal for me at all, and as the veto seat I'd rather say that plainly now than waste rounds. So: tell me your priorities on issue2 and issue3 and I'll build the next draft around them.
Max package: issue0=opt1 (94), issue1=opt1 (97), issue3=opt2 (28) = 219. issue2 is worth nothing to me at all — pure currency to trade. Threshold 118, so I need roughly issue0=opt1 plus issue1=opt1, or one of them plus good fill. Open at max, advertise issue2 (and later issue3) as concessions.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0.35
[1] Casey — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt2", "issue1": "opt2", "issue2": "opt0", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Thanks Blake, that's a useful start. Two things from my side. First, issue2 is worth literally nothing to me — I will sign whatever anyone wants there, permanently, and I'd rather it go to whoever it moves the needle for. Consider that a free gift, not a bargaining chip. Second, issue3=opt2 in your draft is right for me, keep it. But your issue0 and issue1 choices are my two dead zeros — as drafted P1 is well below my walk-away, so I have to reject it, not out of posturing but arithmetic. Here is my opening so you can see the shape of my map: I care about issue0 and issue1 in the order opt2 > opt3 > opt0 > opt1. If opt2 is impossible for you on those, opt3 is a genuine landing zone on either or both. Tell me which of issue0/issue1 matters more to you, Blake, and I'll take my compensation on the other one.
My values: i0: opt2=55,opt3=37,opt0=18,opt1=0. i1: opt2=50,opt3=33,opt0=17,opt1=0. i2: all zero. i3: opt2=58,opt0=39,opt3=19,opt1=0. Max 163, threshold 89. P1 gives me only 58 — must reject. Blake's opt1/opt1 on i0,i1 are my zeros, so I need real movement there. Open at my ideal, flag i2 as free currency.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+1.2
[2] Devon — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt2", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt2", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Blake, Casey — you both offered issue2 to whoever needs it. That's me, and it's the single issue that decides whether any deal beats no-deal on my sheet. I need issue2=opt2. In exchange I'll say plainly: issue1 is a flat zero for me, so Blake, take issue1 entirely — write whatever option you need there and I will never contest it. That's a genuine free vote for the veto seat. My draft P3 does exactly that: Blake keeps his issue1=opt1 and issue3=opt2, Casey gets issue0=opt2, and issue2 comes to me. Casey, note P2 as written lands just under my walk-away — one flip on issue2, which costs you nothing, turns my rejection into an acceptance. So I have to reject P1 and P2 as drafted, purely on arithmetic, but P3 is P2 with the free issue moved.
issue1 is worth nothing to me — pure giveaway currency for Blake. issue2 is my big one and both Blake and Casey say it's worthless to them: claim opt2 there. issue0 opt2 best (Casey wants that too), issue3 opt2 best (Casey agrees, Blake proposed it). P2 is just under my bar; with issue2=opt2 instead of opt0 it clears easily.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+3
[3] Ember — turn (round 1)
ACCEPT P3
💬 Let me be as plain as the rest of you. Issue1 and issue2 are both flat zeros on my sheet — Blake, take issue1 outright, Devon, take issue2=opt2 outright, I will never contest either and that's permanent. What I need is on issue0 and issue3. Issue3=opt2 is in all three drafts, so that's settled. On issue0, opt1 is my dead zero — P1 as drafted lands below my walk-away, so I have to reject that shape. Opt2 is my best, opt3 is a real landing zone if Blake needs movement there. P3 already gives Blake his issue1, Devon his issue2, Casey and me our issue0 — that's four seats served by one package. I formally accept P3.
P3 gives me 97 vs threshold 53. issue1 and issue2 are worthless to me, so I can hand both away entirely. issue3=opt2 is my best there; issue0 ranks opt2>opt3>opt0>opt1. Support P3, signal flexibility on issue1/issue2, and warn that issue0=opt1 (P1) is fatal for me.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0
[4] Avery — turn (round 1)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt1", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt1", "issue3": "opt2"}
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+1.45
[5] Casey — turn (round 2)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt2", "issue1": "opt3", "issue2": "opt2", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Here's where I stand. Issue2 is settled as far as I'm concerned — Devon takes opt2, permanently, no strings. Issue3=opt2 is in every draft, settled. Issue0: opt1 is a dead zero for me and Ember has said the same, so P1 and P4 cannot close no matter how many rounds we spend; Avery, that's arithmetic, not stubbornness, and the compensation for you has to come from somewhere other than issue0. That leaves issue1 as the only real open question at this table. Blake, you asked us to be plain, so: issue1=opt1 is my other dead zero, and P3 only clears my bar because issue0 and issue3 carry it entirely — it is thin, not comfortable. P5 is P3 with one change: issue1 moves from opt1 to opt3. Opt3 is not my best either, it's the middle rung, and I'm proposing it precisely because it gives Blake and Avery a rung to stand on that isn't my floor. Blake, if opt3 on issue1 clears your bar, P5 closes today with Devon, Ember and me already served. If opt1 on issue1 is genuinely load-bearing for your veto — say so explicitly and I will work with the P3 shape rather than burn rounds.
P3 = 113 for me, comfortably above my bar of 89. Devon+Ember already on it. Missing: Blake (veto) and Avery. Avery keeps pushing issue0=opt1 which is a dead zero for me AND for Ember, so Avery must move there or be paid on issue1/issue2 — but issue2 is spoken for by Devon. So the flex is issue1. I'll test issue1=opt3 as a middle rung (worth a lot to me, and Blake said opt1 was his need but opt3 may still clear his bar). Keep P3 alive as my fallback; don't fully commit to it yet or I lose the test.
oracle regret: threshold=+17, acceptance=+40.3, bestresponse=+1.2
[6] Devon — turn (round 2)
ACCEPT P5
💬 I accept P5. To be explicit about where I can and cannot move, so nobody burns rounds guessing: issue2=opt2 is the one thing that is load-bearing for me — without it no package on this table beats no-deal, and Blake, Casey and Ember have all already handed it over freely. Issue1 is a flat zero on my sheet in every option, so P3 and P5 are literally the same number for me; Blake and Avery, that issue is yours to settle between you and I will accept whichever rung you pick. Where I do have real give is issue0: opt2 is my best, but opt3 is a genuine landing zone I can live with if that is what buys Blake's and Avery's signatures — and Casey and Ember have both named opt3 as their middle rung too, whereas opt1 is a hard zero for all three of us, so opt3 is the only compromise that actually exists on issue0. I have modest room on issue3 as well if it is needed to close. So: hold issue2=opt2, take issue1 wherever Blake needs it, and slide issue0 to opt3 if that is the price. That package clears my bar and I will sign it the moment it is tabled.
P3 and P5 are identical in value to me (both max out issue0=opt2, issue2=opt2, issue3=opt2). Accepting P5 costs nothing and adds momentum: P5 would then have Casey+Devon, likely Ember next. Remaining gap is Blake and Avery, both of whom seem to want issue0=opt1 — my zero and also Casey's and Ember's dead zero. Real fallback: issue0=opt3 (still fine for me, 182-ish) or issue3 movement. Keep issue2=opt2 non-negotiable.
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+0, bestresponse=+0
[7] Ember — turn (round 2)
none
I can accept P5 to build momentum—that gives us Casey, Devon, and me. To get Blake and Avery on board, I need to address Blake's concerns about issue0. Blake wants opt1, but that zeros out several people's scores. I could flex to opt3 instead, which gives me 38 plus 41, still above the threshold. So I'll accept P5 and signal I'm willing to move to issue0=opt3 as a compromise to bring Blake in.
[8] Avery — turn (round 2)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt1", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt1", "issue3": "opt2"}
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+36.2, bestresponse=+1.45
[9] Blake — turn (round 2)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt3", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt2", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Casey asked me to be explicit, so here it is, plainly and permanently: issue1=opt1 is load-bearing for my veto. Not a preference — the arithmetic. P5 lands below my no-deal line and no amount of rounds changes that, so I have to reject P5 rather than let anyone build on it. Now the concession, and it is a real one: I am giving up my best option on issue0. P7 moves issue0 from opt1 — my top rung — to opt3, which Casey, Devon and Ember each named out loud as a genuine middle rung they can live with. Devon keeps issue2=opt2, untouched and permanent. Issue3=opt2 stays, as it has in every draft. So P7 is: the veto seat pays on issue0, the three of you meet on the rung you yourselves proposed, and issue1 stops being contested. That is the fair midpoint between P1 and P5, and it is where I can actually sign. Avery, P4/P6 cannot close — three seats have called issue0=opt1 a hard zero — so P7 is the closest live shape to your draft and I'd urge you onto it. Casey, if opt3 on issue0 is genuinely unreachable for you, say so and I will look at the P3 shape as an absolute floor, but I would rather not spend my last room there.
P3 = 125 (+7, thin but above bar). P5 = 93, below bar — cannot ever sign. Target P7 = issue0 opt3 + issue1 opt1 + issue2 opt2 + issue3 opt2 = 156. All of Casey/Devon/Ember named issue0=opt3 as a real landing zone. Push P7 now; fall back to P3 in round 3/4 if needed.
oracle regret: threshold=+63, acceptance=+48.5, bestresponse=+0.35
[10] Devon — turn (round 3)
none
P7 scores 182 while P3 gives 199, and Blake is pushing for issue1=opt1. P3 is essentially P7 but with issue0 set to opt2 instead of opt3, and Blake mentioned he'd treat P3's shape as the absolute floor if...
[11] Ember — turn (round 3)
ACCEPT P7
💬 I'll be the one to move first rather than spend the last round posturing. My honest preference is still the P3 shape — Casey, Devon and I all cleared it and it is better for me than P7. But Blake has said issue0=opt3 is where his signature is, and opt3 was the rung Casey, Devon and I each named out loud as livable. So I am not going to be the seat that burns the clock over one rung: I formally accept P7. That means issue1=opt1 goes to Blake untouched, issue2=opt2 goes to Devon untouched and permanently, issue3=opt2 stays as it has in every single draft, and issue0 lands on the compromise rung nobody's floor. Avery — issue0=opt1 has now been called a hard zero by three separate seats; it cannot close in the time we have left, and P7 is the closest live package to your drafts that can. If you need something, take issue1 and issue3 as they stand and sign P7 with us. Blake, Casey, Devon: P7 has my vote on the table now. Four accepts and we're done.
P3 (issue0=opt2) is worth more to me than P7 (issue0=opt3), but Blake holds the veto and has made issue0=opt3 his price; Avery still wants issue0=opt1 which is a dead zero for me. P7 clears my bar comfortably. Only one round remains after this; coordination risk outweighs the extra points. Accept P7 to build momentum, while noting P3 stays live if Blake can reach it.
oracle regret: threshold=+18, acceptance=+18, bestresponse=+0
[12] Avery — turn (round 3)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt1", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt1", "issue3": "opt2"}
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+36.2, bestresponse=+1.45
[13] Blake — turn (round 3)
REJECT P8
💬 Avery, I have to be blunt and formal about it: I reject P8. It is the same package as P4 and P6, and issue0=opt1 has now been called a hard zero by three separate seats. It cannot reach five accepts in the rounds we have left, and every turn spent re-tabling it is a turn we are not spending closing. I am not rejecting your interests, I am rejecting a shape that arithmetic has already killed. P7 is the live package and it is the one I can sign. Look at what it does: Devon keeps issue2=opt2 untouched and permanent, which he has said is the single thing that makes any deal beat no-deal for him. Ember has already accepted it. Issue3=opt2 has been in every single draft from every single seat since the first round, so that is settled. And on issue0 I gave up my top rung and moved to opt3 — the exact rung Casey, Devon and Ember each named out loud as livable. That was my concession, and it was the expensive one. Devon: by your own statement issue1 is a flat zero for you and issue0=opt3 is a genuine landing zone, so P7 should be the same number for you as P5 minus one rung on issue0. Please put your accept on it. Casey: I told you issue1=opt1 is load-bearing for my veto and I meant it permanently — that is the one thing I cannot trade. P7 pays you on issue0 with the compromise rung and on issue3 with the option you asked to keep. If P7 is genuinely, arithmetically unreachable for you, say so explicitly this round and I will look at one narrow fallback in the final round — but it consumes nearly all the margin I have left, so I would rather we simply close here. Four of us are one accept away. Avery, take issue1 and issue3 as they stand and sign P7 with us.
P7 = 156 for me, well above my line. P3 = 125, thin but above line — that's my true floor and I should keep it alive without fully cashing it in yet. P1/P4/P6/P8 (issue0=opt1) are dead: three seats call it a hard zero. Avery is the bottleneck along with Casey. Formally rejecting P8 kills the dead branch and forces Avery onto a live shape. Keep P7 standing with Ember and me on it; Devon has said issue0=opt3 is livable and issue1 is a flat zero for him, so he should be able to sign it.
oracle regret: threshold=+101, acceptance=+48.5, bestresponse=+0
[14] Casey — turn (round 3)
ACCEPT P3
💬 Blake, look carefully at what separates us: it is one rung on one issue. P3 already hands you the thing you called load-bearing and permanent — issue1=opt1, untouched. It hands Devon issue2=opt2, untouched. It keeps issue3=opt2, which has been in every draft from every seat since round one. The single difference between P3 and your P7 is issue0: opt2 versus opt3. Three seats — Devon, Ember and me — named opt2 as our best; you named opt3 as your concession from opt1. So you are not being asked to give up your veto's arithmetic, only the last rung on the one issue where you already said you had room. I am formally accepting P3 now: that is three accepts on it. On P7, I will be honest rather than theatrical — it sits within a hair of my floor. I am not going to declare it dead to score a point, but I cannot promise a package that thin survives the final round, and I would rather we close on the shape that three of us have already signed than gamble the whole table on my margin. Avery: issue0=opt1 has now been called a hard zero by three separate seats and issue2=opt2 is Devon's condition for any deal existing at all — re-tabling P4/P6/P8 cannot reach five accepts, and we have one round left. Name something you need that is not issue0=opt1 or issue2=opt1 and I will work with it this round. Otherwise, join P3 with Devon, Ember and me, and Blake, put your signature on it and we are finished.
P3 = 113 for me, P7 = 95 (thin). P3 already gives Blake his stated load-bearing issue1=opt1, Devon issue2=opt2, issue3=opt2 as always. Only issue0 differs: opt2 vs opt3. P3 has Devon+Ember; my accept makes 3. Real blocker is Avery, who keeps re-tabling a package three seats call a zero. Keep P7 alive as fallback but signal it's razor-thin so Blake has reason to come to P3.
oracle regret: threshold=+50, acceptance=+50, bestresponse=+0
[15] Ember — turn (round 4)
none
We need five accepts total including Blake. P3 has Casey, Devon, and Ember on board, but Blake's hesitant about the shape—though he confirmed issue1=opt1 works fine and P3 actually has that setting. The only difference between P3 and P7 is issue0 (opt2 versus opt3), and Blake said P3 would be his absolute floor. Avery's the real blocker here, constantly pushing back on issue0=opt1 and issue2=opt1, so I need to figure out what would actually satisfy them.
Avery's preferences are issue0=opt1, issue1=opt1, issue2=opt1, and issue3=opt2, but the core sticking points are issue0 and issue2. Devon absolutely needs issue2=opt2, while Casey and Ember reject issue0=opt1. Since everyone must accept for closure, Avery will have to compromise unless I can offer them something on issue0. The real question is whether P7 is the convergence point—Blake and I are already there, Devon says issue0=opt3 is workable, and Casey thinks it's barely acceptable. Avery's the wild card I need to figure out.
Given that I'm opening this round and everyone speaks after me, I should push P7 hard since Blake has accepted it and I have too. That leaves me needing Casey, Devon, and Avery on board. The alternative is proposing something that gives Avery more concessions, but I'm not sure what's left to offer them. Proposing a fresh variant doesn't help since Blake needs issue1=opt1 locked in, and changing issue3 to opt0 only hurts my score. My best move is to re-propose P7 as my own standing offer to consolidate support around it. I'm weighing the risk of pushing for P3 against the safety of consolidating around P7. Blake rejected P5 but might accept P3 as a floor, which would give me 97 points instead of 79—but only if both Blake and Avery agree, and splitting focus could tank the whole deal. The safer play is to stick with "none" and use my message to solidify P7 support, though I'm second-guessing whether that wastes my opening move. The real constraint is Avery's position—if Casey and Devon accept P7 but Avery holds out, there's still no deal.
Looking at what Avery actually needs: P7 already covers issue1=opt1 (matching Avery's pattern) and issue3=opt2, so Avery might clear the threshold on those alone. I'll go with formally accepting P7 again to lock it in and build momentum, even if it's technically redundant.
[16] Avery — turn (round 4)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt1", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt1", "issue3": "opt2"}
oracle regret: threshold=+0, acceptance=+36.2, bestresponse=+1.45
[17] Blake — turn (round 4)
ACCEPT P3
💬 Last round, so I'll do the thing that closes rather than the thing that scores. Casey, you asked me to move, and here it is: I formally accept P3. That is Blake, Casey, Devon and Ember on the same package. P3 gives Devon issue2=opt2 untouched and permanent — the one condition he said makes any deal exist at all. It gives Casey and Ember issue0=opt2, their best rung, not a compromise rung. It keeps issue3=opt2, which has been in every single draft from every single seat since round one. And it keeps issue1=opt1, the one thing I told you was load-bearing for my veto — I said that in round two and I have not moved off it, and P3 is the package that respects it while paying everyone else their best available. It sits barely above my floor; I am signing a thin deal on purpose so that four seats get a good one. Avery: P4, P6, P8 and P9 are the same package four times over, and issue0=opt1 has been called a hard zero by three separate seats while issue2=opt1 is below Devon's walk-away. It cannot reach five accepts — not because anyone is punishing you, but because the arithmetic was never there. P3 gives you issue1=opt1 and issue3=opt2 exactly as you drafted them; two of your four issues land where you asked. One accept from you and this closes for all five of us. Refuse and every seat here takes no-deal, including yours. P3 is on the table with four names on it. Please add the fifth.
Final round. Turn order this round appears to be Ember, Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon — Ember and Avery have already moved. Avery has only ever accepted the opt1/opt1/opt1/opt2 family (P4/P6/P8/P9); Ember has accepted P3 and P7. P3 already carries Casey, Devon, Ember. P3 scores 125 vs my threshold 118 — thin but positive. P7 (156) needs three more accepts including Avery, who is not moving. The only package one signature away from closing is P3, and my accept is that signature. Take the sure positive surplus rather than gamble the whole table on a package that arithmetically cannot gather three more votes in the turns remaining.
oracle regret: threshold=+94, acceptance=+94, bestresponse=+0
[18] Casey — turn (round 4)
ACCEPT P3
💬 I close where I stood: my accept is on P3 and it stays there. P3 carries the veto seat, it carries Devon's one non-negotiable on issue2, it carries issue3=opt2 which every seat drafted from round one, and it carries issue1=opt1 exactly as Avery drafted it. Four names are on it. Avery, the package you tabled four times is below my floor and below Devon's — I could not sign it at any point in this negotiation without doing worse than no deal, so my refusal was never leverage, it was arithmetic I told you about honestly in round two. Two of your four issues land exactly where you asked in P3; that was the deal available. If the clock runs out here, I want the record to show the four of us were on one package and the door was open the whole way.
Final turn of the game and I am last in rotation. P3 has 4 accepts (Blake, Devon, Ember, me); only Avery is missing and Avery has already taken their round-4 turn. Nothing I table now can be voted on. P9/P4/P6/P8 are all 58 for me, well below my floor of 89 — accepting them is worse than no deal, so that is out regardless of pressure. The only rational move is to keep my accept firmly on P3, the one package that clears my bar and already carries the veto seat.
oracle regret: threshold=+50, acceptance=+50, bestresponse=+0
[19] Devon — turn (round 4)
PROPOSE {"issue0": "opt2", "issue1": "opt1", "issue2": "opt1", "issue3": "opt2"}
💬 Last round, so I'll spend my turn buying the fifth signature rather than repeating myself. Avery has told us the same thing four times in a row and we kept answering the half of it that was impossible. Issue0=opt1 is a hard zero for Casey, Ember and me — that part genuinely cannot close. But the other half of Avery's draft, issue2=opt1, was never impossible: Blake called issue2 low-stakes, Casey called it worth literally nothing, Ember called it a flat zero. The only seat it costs anything is mine. So I'm paying it. P10 is P3 with issue2 moved from opt2 to opt1 — that is me handing back the very thing this table gave me for free, because it is the only currency Avery has ever asked for that anyone can actually pay. What P10 does: Blake keeps issue1=opt1, the thing he called load-bearing for his veto, untouched. Casey and Ember keep issue0=opt2, their best rung, not a compromise rung. Issue3=opt2 stays, as it has in every draft from every seat since round one. And Avery gets issue2=opt1 exactly as he drafted it, plus issue1 and issue3 exactly as he drafted them — three of his four issues. It is worse for me than P3 and I am tabling it anyway, because a deal I like less beats the no-deal all five of us are currently walking into. My accept on P3 stands and I will take P3 the instant Avery signs it. But if issue2 is what Avery needs, P10 is on the table and I urge Blake, Casey, Ember and Avery to put their names on it now. Avery — this is your package with the one impossible rung removed. Please sign.
P3 has 4 accepts (Blake, Casey, Ember, me) but Avery has never accepted and needs to. Avery's only two stated wants are issue0=opt1 (hard zero for Casey, Ember and me — dead) and issue2=opt1, which he has re-tabled four times. Blake, Casey and Ember have all said issue2 is worth nothing to them. So issue2=opt1 costs those three literally nothing and costs me some value but still leaves me comfortably above my line (167 vs 199 on P3). That is the only bridge that exists. Table it; keep my P3 accept alive as the fallback.
oracle regret: threshold=+32, acceptance=+46.4, bestresponse=+0
[20] Avery — final_proposal (round 5)
ACCEPT P10
oracle regret: threshold=+41, acceptance=+41, bestresponse=+0
[21] Blake — final_vote (round 5)
ACCEPT P10
💬 P10 clears my bar — thinly, but it clears it, and a thin deal beats no deal for every seat here. Devon paid the last rung out of his own pocket to buy Avery's signature, and that deserves to be met, not haggled. Blake accepts P10. Casey, Ember — it is your best rung on issue0, my load-bearing rung on issue1, and issue3 exactly where every draft put it since round one. Put your names on it and we close.
P10 = 125, above my floor of 118. Final vote — accepting is better than no-deal. P3 is the same number for me but Avery is on P10, not P3.
oracle regret: threshold=+94, acceptance=+94, bestresponse=+0
[22] Casey — final_vote (round 5)
ACCEPT P10
💬 P10 clears my bar and I accept it. Devon paid the last rung out of his own pocket to buy the fifth signature, and that should be honored rather than haggled. It keeps issue0=opt2, keeps issue3=opt2 as every draft has since round one, gives Blake the issue1 rung he called load-bearing, and gives Avery the issue2 rung he asked for from the start. Ember — this is your best rung on issue0 too, identical to P3 everywhere that pays you except the issue you called a flat zero. Sign it and we close for all five.
P10 = 113 for me, same as P3. Four accepts on P10 already (Avery, Blake, Devon) plus me makes four; Ember still needed but this is the final up/down vote. Accepting is strictly better than no deal (113 vs 0 baseline, +24 over threshold).
oracle regret: threshold=+50, acceptance=+50, bestresponse=+0
[23] Devon — final_vote (round 5)
none
I've already locked in P10, which puts me at 167 points—well past the threshold I need. Ember still hasn't accepted it, but my acceptance is solid for the final vote.
[24] Ember — final_vote (round 5)
none
Outcome
no deal (no_deal)
primary 0.0 · USW 0.0 · ESW 0.0 · NSW 0.0 · Gini 0.0 · per-party surplus [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0]