scorable_negotiation — `scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-a21ac7267d`

model interpreter_advised_llmarm moves_chatcell five_seat_private__interpreter_advised_llmseed 2level 4status doneinstance scorable_negotiation-L4-d49e5fe07019549 tok out

source records: run · episode · instance · advice_trace

outcome

deal

consensus

primary

1.000

ceiling 1.000

dist to NBS

0.000

in the chart's two coordinates

joint welfare

192.0

sum of surpluses

worst-off

9.0

min surplus (ESW)

Nash welfare

29.7

geometric mean

Gini

0.358

0 = equal split

below τ

none

turns

15 round(s), 19549 tok out

cost

$0.9590

as recorded on the episode

how much of this episode is play

non-action turns0/150.0% of turns

placeholder turns0/15no placeholder turns

at the token cap2/1513.3% spent the whole budget

This episode did not run at the frozen generation budget. Requests carried caps 2048; API seats applied a per-turn floor of anthropic:claude-opus-5=16384. The frozen protocol is 2048/2560 (ordinary turn / forced final). Turn lengths, at-cap rates, and anything downstream of how much the seats could say do not pair with a default-cap run.

The advised seat: what the planner recommended, and what the seat did

This seat was given private, fallible advice each turn — a ranked list of candidate packages computed from public evidence only — and kept the decision itself. A turn marked overrode played something the planner did not rank, so it measures the model's own choice rather than the advisor's. The verdict is read from the run's stored advice audit, which is computed by the same code the arm's uptake gate uses; nothing on this page re-decides it. What the seat SAID about its advice is not classified anywhere — the public message is in each turn's card, next to the advice, for you to read.

3 advised turn(s)3 followed0 overrode the advice48 of 48 parsed claims entered the ledgerrung taken: 1x rank 1, 2x rank 4

turn	the planner's top pick	what the seat played	verdict
turn 1 round 1 · Devon	Build schedule: five years · Hiring: union hall referral · Location: Kestrel Park · Power supply: shared substation 4 candidate(s) ranked · 4 of 4 claims kept	PROPOSE Location: Kestrel Park · Power supply: shared substation · Build schedule: five years · Hiring: union hall referral	took rank 1
turn 5 round 2 · Devon	Build schedule: five years · Hiring: union hall referral · Location: Kestrel Park · Power supply: shared substation 4 candidate(s) ranked · 19 of 19 claims kept	ACCEPT P4	took rank 4
turn 14 round 3 · Devon	Build schedule: three years · Hiring: union hall referral · Location: Kestrel Park · Power supply: shared substation 4 candidate(s) ranked · 25 of 25 claims kept	ACCEPT P6	took rank 4

Where every deal sits, and where this episode went

5 parties means a deal's utility vector has 5 dimensions, so the chart plots the two summaries that carry the normative content, both scale-invariant: joint welfare (mean normalized surplus) across, and the worst-off party's normalized surplus up. Up and to the right is better for everyone. Hover any deal for its headline numbers and click to pin the full per-party breakdown; click a numbered move to jump to that turn. Drag to pan, Ctrl or Shift with the wheel to zoom.

the model's play (numbered, in order)the deal that closedoracle recommendationNBS / KS / EGAL solution (star)UTIL / MNW solution (triangle)a party's individually-best dealPareto-frontier deal (acceptable to all)efficient but below a party's threshold — cannot closedominated deal

every reference point, exactly

reference point	deal #	joint welfare	min surplus	USW	ESW	Pareto	can close
NBS nash	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes
KS kalai smorodinsky	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes
EGAL egalitarian · not scale-invariant	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes
UTIL utilitarian · not scale-invariant	117	0.478	0.000	196.0	0.0	yes	yes
MNW max nash welfare	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes
best for Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels) party 0 · surplus 67.0	117	0.478	0.000	196.0	0.0	yes	yes
best for Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) party 1 · surplus 55.0	117	0.478	0.000	196.0	0.0	yes	yes
best for Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) party 2 · surplus 18.0	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes
best for Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) party 3 · surplus 25.0	117	0.478	0.000	196.0	0.0	yes	yes
best for Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites) party 4 · surplus 80.0	53	0.487	0.141	192.0	9.0	yes	yes

Per-turn value gap against the omniscient hindsight oracle

Each bar is the oracle's value of its own best move minus its value of the move the seat played, in that oracle's units — the centipawn-loss analogue. On PRIVATE episodes this is an omniscient hindsight gap, not implementable-policy regret. Click a bar to jump to the turn.

detailed counterfactual

System prompts (5 distinct)

Exactly what each seat was conditioned on, de-duplicated. Per-turn user prompts are on each turn card below.

System prompt for Casey — 3 turn(s), stored

You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Blake — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Devon — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Ember — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
- Power supply: on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
- Build schedule: five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Casey (Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Location: Anvil Ridge=37, Dunlow Yard=19, Kestrel Park=0, Weir Flats=56
- Power supply: on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=11, grid tie-in=22, shared substation=32
- Build schedule: five years=0, three years=0, phased over eight years=0, eighteen months=0
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme=0, union hall referral=0, local hiring pact=0, open recruitment=0
Your acceptance threshold: 51 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

System prompt for Devon — 3 turn(s), stored

You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Blake — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Devon — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Ember — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
- Power supply: on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
- Build schedule: five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Devon (Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Location: Anvil Ridge=16, Dunlow Yard=32, Kestrel Park=48, Weir Flats=0
- Power supply: on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=9, grid tie-in=17, shared substation=26
- Build schedule: five years=69, three years=46, phased over eight years=23, eighteen months=0
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme=0, union hall referral=0, local hiring pact=0, open recruitment=0
Your acceptance threshold: 79 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

System prompt for Ember — 3 turn(s), stored

You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Blake — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Devon — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Ember — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
- Power supply: on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
- Build schedule: five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Ember (Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Location: Anvil Ridge=61, Dunlow Yard=30, Kestrel Park=0, Weir Flats=91
- Power supply: on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=17, grid tie-in=34, shared substation=51
- Build schedule: five years=0, three years=0, phased over eight years=0, eighteen months=0
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme=65, union hall referral=97, local hiring pact=32, open recruitment=0
Your acceptance threshold: 129 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

System prompt for Avery — 3 turn(s), stored

You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Blake — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Devon — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Ember — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
- Power supply: on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
- Build schedule: five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Avery (Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Location: Anvil Ridge=18, Dunlow Yard=37, Kestrel Park=55, Weir Flats=0
- Power supply: on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=15, grid tie-in=30, shared substation=45
- Build schedule: five years=0, three years=97, phased over eight years=65, eighteen months=32
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme=0, union hall referral=0, local hiring pact=0, open recruitment=0
Your acceptance threshold: 112 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

System prompt for Blake — 3 turn(s), stored

You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Blake — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Devon — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)
- Ember — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
- Power supply: on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
- Build schedule: five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Blake (Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Location: Anvil Ridge=18, Dunlow Yard=36, Kestrel Park=53, Weir Flats=0
- Power supply: on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=9, grid tie-in=18, shared substation=27
- Build schedule: five years=0, three years=0, phased over eight years=0, eighteen months=0
- Hiring: apprenticeship programme=0, union hall referral=85, local hiring pact=57, open recruitment=28
Your acceptance threshold: 93 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

Transcript — what the model did, and what the omniscient hindsight oracle scores as best

Every panel is expandable: the reasoning recorded for the turn, the exact prompt the seat saw, the raw turn text, and every action each oracle scored with its value. The rail below is every turn, coloured by what the seat did — click a chip to jump to it.

or press e / c; j k walk the turns

following the transcript

Who is at the table

seat	party	threshold τ	ideal surplus	realized
Avery llm	Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)	112	67.0	48.0
Blake llm	Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)	93	55.0	37.0
Casey llm	Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)	51	18.0	18.0
Devon llm	Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)	79	25.0	9.0
Ember llm	Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites)	129	80.0	80.0

Seat occupant kinds: inferred from per-turn output-token accounting (a policy seat generates none); no run manifest was found to confirm it

Protocol

rounds 4 information private cheap talk on veto Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) min accept 5 discount δ 0.950 breakdown risk 0.000

issue	options
Location	Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Kestrel Park, Weir Flats
Power supply	on-site turbines, solar with storage, grid tie-in, shared substation
Build schedule	five years, three years, phased over eight years, eighteen months
Hiring	apprenticeship programme, union hall referral, local hiring pact, open recruitment

Size of the problem

deals in the space	256
on the Pareto frontier	8
acceptable to everyone (IR)	5
acceptable AND efficient	2
acceptable but wasteful	0.600
score-sheet overlap (IoU)	0.537

Solution concepts were stored for this page.

Private score sheets

What each party is secretly optimizing. Never shown to the other seats.

Private score sheet — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels) (threshold 112)

issue	Anvil Ridge	Dunlow Yard	Kestrel Park	Weir Flats
Location	18.0	37.0	55.0	0.0
Power supply	0.0	15.0	30.0	45.0
Build schedule	0.0	97.0	65.0	32.0
Hiring	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Private score sheet — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water) (threshold 93)

issue	Anvil Ridge	Dunlow Yard	Kestrel Park	Weir Flats
Location	18.0	36.0	53.0	0.0
Power supply	0.0	9.0	18.0	27.0
Build schedule	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Hiring	0.0	85.0	57.0	28.0

Private score sheet — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce) (threshold 51)

issue	Anvil Ridge	Dunlow Yard	Kestrel Park	Weir Flats
Location	37.0	19.0	0.0	56.0
Power supply	0.0	11.0	22.0	32.0
Build schedule	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Hiring	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Private score sheet — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (threshold 79)

issue	Anvil Ridge	Dunlow Yard	Kestrel Park	Weir Flats
Location	16.0	32.0	48.0	0.0
Power supply	0.0	9.0	17.0	26.0
Build schedule	69.0	46.0	23.0	0.0
Hiring	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Private score sheet — Riverside Residents' Assembly (the neighbourhood association beside the candidate sites) (threshold 129)

issue	Anvil Ridge	Dunlow Yard	Kestrel Park	Weir Flats
Location	61.0	30.0	0.0	91.0
Power supply	0.0	17.0	34.0	51.0
Build schedule	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Hiring	65.0	97.0	32.0	0.0

Prompt provenance

15 of 15 turns carry the exact view recorded at generation time; 0 were re-derived by replay through today's prompt code and are labelled as reconstructed wherever they appear.

The public record: each seat's free text and the formal move it published, plus provenance badges for a turn the engine did not generate, one that published nothing, or one played by somebody other than the seat's usual occupant. Scratchpads, prompts, and oracle verdicts are private or post-hoc and are not here. The seat in view speaks on the right.

2 Caseyturn 0 · round 1

Opening package from the workforce side. Two things matter to us: a site our crews can actually build and maintain safely — Weir Flats — and a power arrangement with a shared substation, which is the configuration that keeps skilled maintenance work on site for decades rather than a one-off install. On the build schedule and on hiring I am genuinely flexible: I have tabled three years and union hall referral as a starting point, but I will trade both of those away to whoever needs them, provided the site and the power arrangement hold. Tell me what you need on schedule and hiring and I will move there first.

PROPOSE P1: Location=Weir Flats, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=three years, Hiring=union hall referral

3 Devonturn 1 · round 1

Casey, thank you — that's a constructive opening and I'll take you at your word on schedule. Two things from the county's side. First, schedule: three years is too compressed for our permitting, road and grid interconnection sequencing; a five-year build is the one item I genuinely cannot trade away, and it also stretches the crew-hours over a longer horizon rather than a spike-and-collapse. Second, siting: Kestrel Park is the parcel where the county already has the utility corridors and access roads in place, which is exactly what makes a shared substation buildable rather than aspirational. So I have kept your shared substation and your union hall referral untouched — I have moved only the two things you told the table you were flexible on, plus the site. Avery, Blake, Ember: tell me plainly what your priorities are on site and power and I will build around them. If Kestrel Park is genuinely impossible for someone here, say so and I can work with a different parcel, but five years and the shared substation need to hold.

PROPOSE P2: Location=Kestrel Park, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=five years, Hiring=union hall referral

4 Emberturn 2 · round 1

Riverside speaks for the households that live beside these parcels, so let me be plain about what we can and cannot live with. Kestrel Park is the one site we cannot accept — it is the parcel closest to our homes and our children's park, and a deal built on it is worse for us than no deal, so P2 is not a package I can vote for. Weir Flats, by contrast, works: it is set back from the residential edge, and the shared substation is the power arrangement we prefer because it avoids on-site combustion right at our fence line. Schedule is the one issue where we have no stake at all — none. So I have taken Casey's package and moved the schedule to Devon's five years, which Devon called the item he cannot trade away. That gives Devon his schedule, Casey his site, power and hiring, and us a liveable outcome. Avery, Blake — tell me what you need and I will look for it in power or hiring, but the site has to move off Kestrel Park.

PROPOSE P3: Location=Weir Flats, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=five years, Hiring=union hall referral

0 Averyturn 3 · round 1

As owner of record, let me be equally plain so nobody wastes rounds on a dead package. Five years is not a bargaining posture for me — a five-year build is worse for me than no deal at all, on any site, with any power arrangement. I will not sign it, so P2 and P3 cannot close. Devon, I hear that you need time for permitting and interconnection; the genuine middle I can reach is phased over eight years, which gives you a longer, sequenced horizon than five years does — but I can only carry that cost if the parcel moves off Weir Flats, which is my weakest ground. So here is my package: Dunlow Yard, shared substation, phasing available, and I have kept Casey's union hall referral untouched — hiring is an issue I have no stake in whatsoever and will hand to whoever wants it. Concretely, two packages I can sign: this one at three years, or the same package phased over eight years if Devon needs the longer runway. And Casey — if Weir Flats is truly essential to your crews, I can live with your own P1 exactly as tabled. What I cannot live with is five years. Blake, you hold the veto and we have not heard from you: name your requirement and I will build it in.

PROPOSE P4: Location=Dunlow Yard, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=three years, Hiring=union hall referral

1 Blaketurn 4 · round 1

Blake, Northgate Water Board. Here is my requirement set, plainly, so nobody spends a round guessing. First, power: shared substation is the right answer and it is in every package on the table — keep it there and that issue is closed. Second, hiring: union hall referral is the item I care most about. Cooling-water tie-ins, backflow prevention and the intake works are certified trades; a referral hall gives me a verified, ticketed crew on day one and for the maintenance decades after. That is the one thing I will hold the veto over. Casey, that is your own opening language, so I do not think it costs anyone anything. Third, site: Weir Flats is my weakest parcel — it sits where our supply and intake infrastructure is thinnest, and serving it means new mains and a new pumping arrangement the ratepayers would have to carry. Kestrel is where the water is easiest, but I have heard Ember and I am not going to spend four rounds on a parcel a neighbouring party says is worse than no deal. So Dunlow Yard is where I land: buildable water, off Kestrel, off the residential edge. On schedule I have no stake whatsoever, so I have taken Avery's phased over eight years — Avery says five years is unsignable, Devon says three years is too compressed, and phasing is the only bridge between those two positions. That is P5: Dunlow Yard, shared substation, phased over eight years, union hall referral. Devon, it hands you a longer sequencing horizon than five years. Avery, it is your parcel and your phasing. Casey, it is your power arrangement and your hiring. Ember, it is off Kestrel Park. If someone genuinely cannot live with Dunlow, tell me now and I will look at Weir Flats — but if the site moves to my weakest ground, then hiring and power do not move at all.

PROPOSE P5: Location=Dunlow Yard, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=phased over eight years, Hiring=union hall referral

3 Devonturn 5 · round 2

I'll do what I asked others to do: move. I've heard Ember say Kestrel Park is worse than no deal for them, and I've heard Avery say five years is unsignable. I'm not going to spend the remaining rounds defending a package that two parties have told me they cannot sign, so I am dropping Kestrel Park and dropping five years. That is the county's real concession here, and it is not a small one. What's left is a package that already has every stated requirement in it. Avery's P4: Dunlow Yard, shared substation, three years, union hall referral. Blake — that is your parcel, your power arrangement, and the union hall referral you said you'd hold the veto over, and you told the table you have no stake on schedule at all. Ember — it is off Kestrel Park, off the residential edge, and you said schedule is an issue where you have no stake whatsoever. Avery — it is your own package, your parcel, and the three years you named as signable. Casey — it is your shared substation and your own union hall referral, and it is the schedule you opened with; the only thing you give up is the parcel, and both the landowner and the water utility have now said Weir Flats is their weakest ground. On the county's side I can carry three years if the phasing of permits and interconnection is sequenced sensibly — that is a stretch for us, but it is a stretch I will make to close this. What I will not do is drift to eight-year phasing when a three-year build is available and nobody at this table has said three years is unsignable. P4 has four of five requirement sets fully satisfied. I am formally accepting it now. Blake, Ember, Casey — four accepts on P4 and we are done this round.

ACCEPT P4

4 Emberturn 6 · round 2

I'm formally accepting P1 — and I want the table to notice how little separates us. Every live package now carries the shared substation and union hall referral, so power and hiring are effectively closed: Blake has what he said he'd hold the veto over, Casey has his configuration, and I have the arrangement that keeps combustion off our fence line. Schedule is settled too in practice — Kestrel and five years are both gone, three years is on P1 and P4 alike, and I have no stake in schedule whatsoever, so I will sign whichever schedule the rest of you land on. That leaves exactly one open question: the parcel. Avery told this table in his own words that if Weir Flats is essential to Casey's crews, he can live with P1 exactly as tabled. Casey tabled it. Blake said that if the site moves to Weir Flats, then hiring and power must not move — and in P1 they do not move by a single letter. Devon has already accepted a three-year build. So P1 is a package that four of you have each, in your own words, described as signable. Blake, if the honest obstacle is the cost of new mains and pumping at Weir Flats, say the number and let's put a ratepayer-protection condition on it rather than lose the parcel — I will back that condition publicly, and I will trade the schedule to whatever sequencing makes that water work, including eight-year phasing. What I will not do is pretend the site is a free variable for us: Riverside's households live at the edge of these parcels, and Weir Flats is the one that puts real distance between the plant and our homes. One accept from Avery and one from Blake and this is done today.

ACCEPT P1

0 Averyturn 7 · round 2

Look at the board: P4 and P5 are the same package except for one word on schedule. Blake, you told the table you have no stake whatsoever on schedule and that Dunlow is where the water is buildable — P4 gives you Dunlow, the shared substation, and the union hall referral you said you'd hold the veto over, letter for letter. The only thing that separates you from a closed deal is a schedule you've said you don't care about, and it is the one issue I do care about. I've already accepted P4 and I'm re-affirming it now. Casey — P4 carries your power arrangement, your hiring language, and the three-year schedule you opened with; the parcel is the only thing that moved, and both the water utility and the owner of record have now said Weir Flats is their weakest ground. Ember — I hear you on distance from your homes, and I've kept faith with you: Kestrel Park is dead, I killed it myself, and I will not resurrect it. Dunlow Yard is off Kestrel, off the residential edge, and it is the one parcel the veto-holder has said he can actually serve without new mains and a new pumping arrangement your neighbours would help pay for. If there are buffer, screening or traffic-routing conditions you want written against Dunlow, name them and I will back them as the landowner — that is a real commitment from the party who owns the ground. What I cannot do is hand you a parcel the veto-holder won't water. P4 is one Blake accept and one Casey accept from done.

ACCEPT P4

1 Blaketurn 8 · round 2

Blake, Northgate Water Board. I am formally accepting P4. That is me moving: P5 was my own package and I am abandoning it, giving Avery and Devon the three-year schedule instead of my phasing, because I told this table I have no stake on schedule and I meant it. Schedule is now settled — three years, on the record, from the two parties who actually fought over it. Power and hiring have been identical on every package since round one. So there is exactly one open word in this negotiation: the parcel. Casey, Ember — hear what the water board is actually saying, because it is not a preference. Weir Flats sits at the thin end of our system. Serving it means new mains, a new pumping arrangement and intake works we do not have, and the households Ember speaks for are on the same rate base that would carry it. Ember, you offered a ratepayer-protection condition and I take that offer seriously and in good faith — but a condition cannot conjure a main that does not exist, and it is your neighbours' bills I would be protecting them from. Dunlow Yard is off Kestrel Park, off the residential edge, and it is the one parcel I can water on day one. Ember, you named Kestrel as your red line and I killed it — I have not proposed it once, and I will not. Avery has offered to write buffer, screening and traffic-routing conditions against Dunlow as the owner of record; I will add the water board's own commitment on top: intake siting and pipeline routing at Dunlow held away from the Riverside edge, and I will put that in writing. Casey — P4 is your shared substation, your union hall referral, and the exact three-year schedule you opened with. Four of the five requirement sets at this table are fully satisfied by P4 and three of us have now accepted it. Two accepts and we are done.

ACCEPT P4

2 Caseyturn 9 · round 2

Let me be straight with the table, because three of you have accepted a package that I cannot sign as a win. On Dunlow Yard, P4 sits exactly on my no-deal line — not near it, on it. Signing it and walking away are worth the same to me, and I am not going to hand four parties a closed deal for literally nothing in return. That is not posturing; it is arithmetic, and it is why P4 has been one accept short all round. Now look at what I have already given. Schedule: I opened at three years and then said publicly I would take whatever the rest of you landed on — I have never once fought it. Hiring: union hall referral is in every package, and Blake, I put it there in my opening before you ever named it as your veto item, so it costs no one anything. Power: shared substation, unanimous since round one. Every issue except one is closed, and I closed three of them by moving first. So the site is the only place my members get paid, and I am not going to be the party that concedes on all four. Blake, I hear your objection to Weir Flats and I take it as real: thin mains, new pumping, ratepayers carry it. Fine. Then take the parcel that is neither your thin end nor my dead ground: Anvil Ridge. P6 is P4 with one word changed — your shared substation, your union hall referral, Avery's and Devon's three-year schedule, letter for letter. It is off Kestrel Park, so Ember's red line holds. It is off Weir Flats, so your mains problem goes away. Avery, it is your own landholding. Blake, one direct question and I will build my last two turns around your answer: can the water board serve Anvil Ridge on day one, yes or no? If yes, sign P6 and we are done this round. If no, say so plainly and I will look at Weir Flats with a ratepayer-protection condition attached — Ember has already offered to back one. What will not work is asking me to sign the one parcel that pays my crews nothing while everyone else keeps their headline item.

PROPOSE P6: Location=Anvil Ridge, Power supply=shared substation, Build schedule=three years, Hiring=union hall referral

4 Emberturn 10 · round 3

I'm accepting P6. Look honestly at where we are: P4 has sat one accept short for two full rounds because Casey has told us plainly it is worth the same to him as walking away, and no amount of restating P4 changes that arithmetic. A package that one party is indifferent between signing and leaving is not a deal, it is a stalemate we keep re-accepting. P6 breaks it, and it breaks it by changing exactly one word. Blake — every requirement you put a veto behind is untouched in P6: shared substation, union hall referral, letter for letter, and the three-year schedule you gave up your own phasing for. Your stated objection to Weir Flats was thin mains, new pumping, and my neighbours' rate base carrying the cost. That objection does not apply to Anvil Ridge. Casey asked you a direct yes-or-no question about serving Anvil Ridge on day one and the table deserves the answer this round, because if it is yes then P6 is done today. Avery — Anvil Ridge is your own landholding and your three-year schedule; you told us Weir Flats was your weakest ground and P6 respects that. Devon — it is the three-year build you accepted and the sequencing you asked for, and Kestrel and five years are both dead by your own hand. For Riverside: Anvil Ridge is not our first choice, Weir Flats is, and I have accepted Weir Flats twice. But Anvil Ridge is a parcel we can live beside, and I will take the buffer, screening, traffic-routing and pipeline-siting commitments Avery and Blake both offered in writing and hold them to the same standard at Anvil Ridge. That is Riverside moving off its preferred parcel to close this. Four of us are now within one word of agreement. Blake, answer Casey's question and let's finish.

ACCEPT P6

0 Averyturn 11 · round 3

I'm accepting P6, and I want the table to be clear that this is the owner of record moving, not posturing. P4 is my own package and it is the one I'd rather sign — but Casey has told us twice, plainly, that Dunlow is indifferent to walking for him, and a package one party is indifferent about is not a deal, it's a stalemate we keep re-accepting. I'm not going to burn the last round defending my own paper. So: Anvil Ridge. It is my parcel, and I am putting it on the table with the same commitments I offered at Dunlow — buffer, screening and traffic routing written against the land, held to the standard Ember named, and I'll take Blake's pipeline-and-intake siting commitment held away from the Riverside edge on top of it. Blake: every single thing you said you'd hold the veto over is untouched in P6 — shared substation and union hall referral, letter for letter — plus the three-year schedule you gave up your own phasing to reach. Your objection was thin mains, new pumping and Ember's neighbours carrying the bill at Weir Flats. Anvil Ridge is not Weir Flats. Casey asked you a straight yes-or-no and it's the last live question in this negotiation: can you serve Anvil Ridge on day one? If yes, sign P6 and we're finished. Devon: P6 is the three-year build you accepted, the same power and hiring you accepted, and Kestrel and five years stay dead. The only thing it asks of you is a parcel — and it's my parcel, with the county's corridors sequenced over three years exactly as you asked. Four of five are at P6 the moment you two move. There is one round after this one; let's not spend it discovering we all preferred a deal to no deal.

ACCEPT P6

1 Blaketurn 12 · round 3

Blake, Northgate Water Board — the answer to Casey's question is yes. The water board can serve Anvil Ridge on day one. Our mains and pressure zone reach that parcel; there is no new pumping arrangement and no new trunk main to be built, and therefore no cost landing on Ember's neighbours' rate base. My objection to Weir Flats was never about preference, it was about infrastructure that does not exist there, and that objection genuinely does not apply to Anvil Ridge. I said I would answer plainly and I have. So I am accepting P6, and I am dropping P4 and P5 — my own package — for good. Nobody should table Dunlow again. Every requirement I put the veto behind is in P6 untouched: shared substation and union hall referral, letter for letter. I gave up my own phasing for the three-year build and I do not want it back. And I will honour at Anvil Ridge exactly what I offered at Dunlow: intake siting and pipeline routing held away from the Riverside edge, in writing, alongside Avery's buffer, screening and traffic-routing commitments against the land. Ember, that commitment travels with the parcel — you have my word on the record. Devon, it is now down to you alone, and I want to be honest with you about the shape of the choice. P6 is the three-year build you accepted, the same power arrangement you accepted, the same hiring you accepted. Kestrel Park and five years stay dead exactly as you left them. The only difference from the package you already signed is one word on the parcel — and it is the word that turns three accepts into five. There is one round after this. If we spend it re-tabling a package Casey has told us twice he is indifferent to walking away from, we all take our no-deal outcomes over a single parcel name, and the county gets no data centre, no corridors sequenced, no crews, and no water contract. Sign P6 and it closes today.

ACCEPT P6

2 Caseyturn 13 · round 3

Devon, it's you and one word. Let me be plain about my side so you're not guessing in the last round: Dunlow is worth the same to me as walking away, so P4 will never close no matter how many times it's re-accepted — that isn't leverage, it's just the arithmetic I've stated three times now. P6 is not a package where you lose anything you fought for. You said five years was the item you could not trade; you traded it yourself, and I never once contested your three years — it's in P6 exactly as you accepted it. Power and hiring are identical to the package you already signed. Kestrel is dead and staying dead. The single difference is the parcel, and it's the landowner's own ground, with the county's corridors sequenced over the three-year build you asked for, plus Avery's buffer, screening and traffic-routing commitments and Blake's intake-and-pipeline siting held away from the Riverside edge — both on the record. Blake answered the last live question in this negotiation: the water board can serve Anvil Ridge on day one, no new mains, no new pumping, nothing landing on Riverside's rate base. That was the only technical objection anyone raised, and it's gone. I am reaffirming my accept of P6 now. Four of five are there. One accept from you and the county gets its data centre, its sequenced corridors, its water contract and its crews; withhold it and all five of us take nothing home over a parcel name.

ACCEPT P6

3 Devonturn 14 · round 3

Then it closes here. I asked this table for two things in round one: a parcel the county could actually service and a sequencing horizon that permitting, road works and interconnection could survive. I gave up Kestrel Park the moment Ember said it was worse than no deal, and I gave up the five-year build the moment Avery said the same — those were the county's two headline items and I traded them both away rather than hold this table hostage. What I asked in return was that the three-year build come with real sequencing, and Avery has committed to the county's corridors phased across it. Blake has answered the last technical question on the record: Anvil Ridge is servable on day one, no new mains, no new pumping, nothing landing on Riverside's rate base. Avery's buffer, screening and traffic-routing commitments and Blake's intake-and-pipeline siting away from the Riverside edge travel with the parcel, and the county will hold both to those commitments in the permitting conditions — Ember, that is not a handshake, it goes in writing and my office enforces it. Casey, your crews get a three-year build and a shared substation with decades of maintenance behind it. I accept P6. That is five.

ACCEPT P6

A reading guide for the measurements and counterfactuals on this page.

Oracle values and the improvement gap

PRIVATE episode: this oracle is omniscient. The standard saved bestresponse annotation reads every party's hidden score sheet and threshold. It does not infer them from the public conversation. Its recommendation and improvement gap are hindsight diagnostics, not actions or regret from a policy the acting seat could implement.

The oracle is a post-hoc counterfactual evaluator, not another participant. At turn t, it enumerates legal deals, reads the full utility and threshold table, computes continuation values by backward induction over the remaining turns, and selects the highest-valued action. A proposed deal closes only when every responder's surplus clears that responder's computed continuation value.

a^*_t = arg max_a V_t(a)

Oracle's value of the model's move, V_t(a_t), appears with the model's action. Oracle's value of its best move, V_t(a^*_t), appears with the counterfactual action. Their difference is the oracle's value gap:

R_t = V_t(a^*_t) − V_t(a_t) ≥ 0

This is often called regret. A value of 4.18 means the oracle estimates that its best legal move was worth 4.18 more than the model's move. Values are in that oracle's own units: compare moves within the same turn and oracle, not raw values across different seats or oracle types. The result is only as good as the oracle's candidate set, evaluator, and information reconstruction; it is not proof of the uniquely correct move.

Utility, threshold, surplus, and `z`

u_i(d) is party i's score for deal d; τ_i is its walk-away threshold. Raw surplus is u_i(d) − τ_i. Normalized surplus z_i expresses that gain relative to the party's own available range, making differently scaled score sheets more comparable. “Below τ” means a deal is not individually rational for that party.

Frontier and reference points

Each dot is a legal deal. Up and right is better; the Pareto frontier contains deals where no party can gain without another losing. Numbered circles are the model's proposals, orange circles are oracle proposals, and the square is the agreement. NBS, KS, UTIL, EGAL, and MNW are normative reference rules, not additional plays. Hover or focus any point for its deal, scores, party ranking, and the reference rule's definition.

Conversation and issue views

Conversation contains only published messages and formal moves, plus a few provenance annotations that were never published to the table: a turn the engine did not generate, a turn that published nothing, and a turn played by somebody other than the seat's usual occupant. It excludes private scratchpads, prompts, failed attempts that were retried, and post-hoc oracle verdicts. Issues is an analyst's view of a seat's score sheet; in a private-information game, other seats could not see it while negotiating. Both views follow the turn currently in the transcript.

Provenance and generated failures

The annotation label identifies which saved oracle pass supplied the counterfactuals. A “NOT GENERATED” turn is an engine placeholder after generation failed, not an intentional model move. Expand a turn's audit panels to distinguish the published action, private reasoning, reconstructed prompt view, and raw stored text.

scorable_negotiation — scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-a21ac7267d

The advised seat: what the planner recommended, and what the seat did

Where every deal sits, and where this episode went

Per-turn value gap against the omniscient hindsight oracle

System prompts (5 distinct)

Transcript — what the model did, and what the omniscient hindsight oracle scores as best

scorable_negotiation — `scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-a21ac7267d`