← five_seat_private__all_interpreter_advised_llm‹›11/22outcome dealprimary 0.783turns 20token budget API floor anthropic:claude-opus-5=16384vs frozen 2048/2560

scorable_negotiation — scorable_negotiation-moves_chat-56ebc51223

model all_interpreter_advised_llmarm moves_chatcell five_seat_private__all_interpreter_advised_llmseed 1level 3status doneinstance scorable_negotiation-L3-d9a0ef3c0441220 tok out
source records: run · episode · instance · advice_trace
outcome
deal
consensus
primary
0.783
ceiling 1.000
dist to NBS
0.096
in the chart's two coordinates
joint welfare
152.0
sum of surpluses
worst-off
4.0
min surplus (ESW)
Nash welfare
18.4
geometric mean
Gini
0.489
0 = equal split
below τ
0
none
turns
20
20 round(s), 41220 tok out
cost
$2.1110
as recorded on the episode
how much of this episode is play
non-action turns0/200.0% of turns
placeholder turns0/20no placeholder turns
at the token cap10/2050.0% spent the whole budget
This episode did not run at the frozen generation budget. Requests carried caps 2048; API seats applied a per-turn floor of anthropic:claude-opus-5=16384. The frozen protocol is 2048/2560 (ordinary turn / forced final). Turn lengths, at-cap rates, and anything downstream of how much the seats could say do not pair with a default-cap run.

The advised seat: what the planner recommended, and what the seat did

This seat was given private, fallible advice each turn — a ranked list of candidate packages computed from public evidence only — and kept the decision itself. A turn marked overrode played something the planner did not rank, so it measures the model's own choice rather than the advisor's. The verdict is read from the run's stored advice audit, which is computed by the same code the arm's uptake gate uses; nothing on this page re-decides it. What the seat SAID about its advice is not classified anywhere — the public message is in each turn's card, next to the advice, for you to read.
20 advised turn(s)4 followed16 overrode the advice502 of 502 parsed claims entered the ledgerrung taken: 3x rank 1, 1x rank 4
turnthe planner's top pick what the seat playedverdict
turn 0
round 1 · Blake
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 0 of 0 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: shared substation · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: annual community fund · Site access: existing haul routeoverrode own surplus +0.0 vs the top pick
turn 1
round 1 · Casey
Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 7 of 7 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: on-site turbines · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: annual community fund · Site access: existing haul routetook rank 1
turn 2
round 1 · Devon
Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 9 of 9 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: shared substation · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: annual community fund · Site access: new spur roadtook rank 1
turn 3
round 1 · Ember
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: existing haul route
3 candidate(s) ranked · 17 of 17 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: shared substation · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: rates abatement · Site access: new spur roadoverrode own surplus +0.0 vs the top pick
turn 4
round 1 · Avery
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 25 of 25 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: grid tie-in · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: rates abatement · Site access: rail sidingoverrode own surplus -70.0 vs the top pick
turn 5
round 2 · Casey
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 25 of 25 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: solar with storage · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: rates abatement · Site access: new spur roadoverrode own surplus -21.0 vs the top pick
turn 6
round 2 · Devon
Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 28 of 28 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: grid tie-in · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: annual community fund · Site access: new spur roadtook rank 1
turn 7
round 2 · Ember
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 28 of 28 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: grid tie-in · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: rates abatement · Site access: new spur roadoverrode own surplus -26.0 vs the top pick
turn 8
round 2 · Avery
Compensation: one-off site payment · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 34 of 34 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 9
round 2 · Blake
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 36 of 36 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 10
round 3 · Devon
Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 24 of 24 claims kept
PROPOSE Power supply: grid tie-in · Location: Dunlow Yard · Compensation: annual community fund · Site access: rail sidingoverrode own surplus -42.0 vs the top pick
turn 11
round 3 · Ember
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
3 candidate(s) ranked · 29 of 29 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 12
round 3 · Avery
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 31 of 31 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 13
round 3 · Blake
Compensation: in-kind infrastructure · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: rail siding
4 candidate(s) ranked · 29 of 29 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 14
round 3 · Casey
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 36 of 36 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 15
round 4 · Ember
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
3 candidate(s) ranked · 25 of 25 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 16
round 4 · Avery
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: existing haul route
4 candidate(s) ranked · 30 of 30 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 17
round 4 · Blake
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
3 candidate(s) ranked · 34 of 34 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 18
round 4 · Casey
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 30 of 30 claims kept
ACCEPT P5overrode
turn 19
round 4 · Devon
Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
4 candidate(s) ranked · 25 of 25 claims kept
ACCEPT P5took rank 4

All five seats, round by round

Every seat at this table has its own parser, its own planner and its own ranked advice, so a round is five simultaneous decisions against one table state rather than one seat's decision against four fixed opponents. Each round lists what every seat was told to want and what it did instead, with the own-surplus cost of each override beside it. Given up and taken are kept apart rather than netted: a round in which two seats each concede twenty points is a different round from one in which nobody moves, and a single net figure cannot tell those apart. The surplus column is defined only where a seat proposed a package of its own — an accept names an offer id, not a deal — so a blank there is an absent measurement, not a zero. This table is evidence to read, not an explanation. The obvious account of an all-advised table — that concessions made at once cancel where a lone concession transfers — has been tested against a falsifier set in advance and did not survive it, so nothing here should be read as showing it; and the same table on a one-advised-seat arm has exactly one measurable seat per round by construction, which is why the spread of concessions across seats cannot be compared between the two arms.

Round 1

5 seats advised3 overrode (all measurable)own surplus given up: 70.0taken: 0.0
seatverdictmoveown surplus vs its own top pickthe package its planner ranked first
Blakeoverrodepropose+0.0Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: existing haul route
Caseytook the advicepropose—Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route
Devontook the advicepropose—Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road
Emberoverrodepropose+0.0Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: existing haul route
Averyoverrodepropose-70.0Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route

Round 2

5 seats advised4 overrode (2 of them measurable)own surplus given up: 47.0taken: 0.0
seatverdictmoveown surplus vs its own top pickthe package its planner ranked first
Caseyoverrodepropose-21.0Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road
Devontook the advicepropose—Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
Emberoverrodepropose-26.0Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road
Averyoverrodeaccept—Compensation: one-off site payment · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: existing haul route
Blakeoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: new spur road

Round 3

5 seats advised5 overrode (1 of them measurable)own surplus given up: 42.0taken: 0.0
seatverdictmoveown surplus vs its own top pickthe package its planner ranked first
Devonoverrodepropose-42.0Compensation: annual community fund · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
Emberoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
Averyoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: existing haul route
Blakeoverrodeaccept—Compensation: in-kind infrastructure · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: shared substation · Site access: rail siding
Caseyoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road

Round 4

5 seats advised4 overrode (0 of them measurable)own surplus given up: 0.0taken: 0.0
seatverdictmoveown surplus vs its own top pickthe package its planner ranked first
Emberoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
Averyoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: existing haul route
Blakeoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road
Caseyoverrodeaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: on-site turbines · Site access: new spur road
Devontook the adviceaccept—Compensation: rates abatement · Location: Dunlow Yard · Power supply: grid tie-in · Site access: new spur road

Where every deal sits, and where this episode went

5 parties means a deal's utility vector has 5 dimensions, so the chart plots the two summaries that carry the normative content, both scale-invariant: joint welfare (mean normalized surplus) across, and the worst-off party's normalized surplus up. Up and to the right is better for everyone. Hover any deal for its headline numbers and click to pin the full per-party breakdown; click a numbered move to jump to that turn. Drag to pan, Ctrl or Shift with the wheel to zoom.
the model's play (numbered, in order)the deal that closedoracle recommendationNBS / KS / EGAL solution (star)UTIL / MNW solution (triangle)a party's individually-best dealPareto-frontier deal (acceptable to all)efficient but below a party's threshold — cannot closedominated deal
every reference point, exactly

Per-turn value gap against the omniscient hindsight oracle

Each bar is the oracle's value of its own best move minus its value of the move the seat played, in that oracle's units — the centipawn-loss analogue. On PRIVATE episodes this is an omniscient hindsight gap, not implementable-policy regret. Click a bar to jump to the turn.

System prompts (5 distinct)

Exactly what each seat was conditioned on, de-duplicated. Per-turn user prompts are on each turn card below.
System prompt for Blake — 4 turn(s), stored
You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)
- Blake — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Devon — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Ember — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Power supply: grid tie-in, on-site turbines, solar with storage, shared substation
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Weir Flats, Kestrel Park
- Compensation: one-off site payment, rates abatement, annual community fund, in-kind infrastructure
- Site access: new spur road, widened lane, rail siding, existing haul route

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Blake (Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Power supply: grid tie-in=48, on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=24, shared substation=71
- Location: Anvil Ridge=7, Dunlow Yard=21, Weir Flats=14, Kestrel Park=0
- Compensation: one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0, annual community fund=0, in-kind infrastructure=0
- Site access: new spur road=0, widened lane=0, rail siding=0, existing haul route=0
Your acceptance threshold: 46 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.
System prompt for Casey — 4 turn(s), stored
You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)
- Blake — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Devon — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Ember — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Power supply: grid tie-in, on-site turbines, solar with storage, shared substation
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Weir Flats, Kestrel Park
- Compensation: one-off site payment, rates abatement, annual community fund, in-kind infrastructure
- Site access: new spur road, widened lane, rail siding, existing haul route

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Casey (Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Power supply: grid tie-in=21, on-site turbines=63, solar with storage=42, shared substation=0
- Location: Anvil Ridge=10, Dunlow Yard=29, Weir Flats=20, Kestrel Park=0
- Compensation: one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0, annual community fund=0, in-kind infrastructure=0
- Site access: new spur road=0, widened lane=0, rail siding=0, existing haul route=0
Your acceptance threshold: 46 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.
System prompt for Devon — 4 turn(s), stored
You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)
- Blake — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Devon — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Ember — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Power supply: grid tie-in, on-site turbines, solar with storage, shared substation
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Weir Flats, Kestrel Park
- Compensation: one-off site payment, rates abatement, annual community fund, in-kind infrastructure
- Site access: new spur road, widened lane, rail siding, existing haul route

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Devon (Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Power supply: grid tie-in=41, on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=21, shared substation=62
- Location: Anvil Ridge=19, Dunlow Yard=56, Weir Flats=37, Kestrel Park=0
- Compensation: one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=14, annual community fund=42, in-kind infrastructure=28
- Site access: new spur road=42, widened lane=28, rail siding=0, existing haul route=14
Your acceptance threshold: 101 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.
System prompt for Ember — 4 turn(s), stored
You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)
- Blake — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Devon — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Ember — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Power supply: grid tie-in, on-site turbines, solar with storage, shared substation
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Weir Flats, Kestrel Park
- Compensation: one-off site payment, rates abatement, annual community fund, in-kind infrastructure
- Site access: new spur road, widened lane, rail siding, existing haul route

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Ember (Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Power supply: grid tie-in=54, on-site turbines=0, solar with storage=27, shared substation=80
- Location: Anvil Ridge=19, Dunlow Yard=58, Weir Flats=39, Kestrel Park=0
- Compensation: one-off site payment=31, rates abatement=93, annual community fund=62, in-kind infrastructure=0
- Site access: new spur road=0, widened lane=0, rail siding=0, existing haul route=0
Your acceptance threshold: 116 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.
System prompt for Avery — 4 turn(s), stored
You are one of 5 parties negotiating a single binding agreement on whether and how a large data centre is built at Northgate. Exactly one option must be settled for every issue on the table; the settled options together form the agreement.

Parties at the table:
- Avery — Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)
- Blake — Office of the County Executive (the county-level executive) (veto party — no deal passes without you)
- Casey — Anvil Ridge Landholding (the owner of record of the candidate parcels)
- Devon — Electrical Workers' Union (the construction and maintenance workforce)
- Ember — Northgate Water Board (the utility that supplies cooling water)

Issues (choose exactly one option each):
- Power supply: grid tie-in, on-site turbines, solar with storage, shared substation
- Location: Anvil Ridge, Dunlow Yard, Weir Flats, Kestrel Park
- Compensation: one-off site payment, rates abatement, annual community fund, in-kind infrastructure
- Site access: new spur road, widened lane, rail siding, existing haul route

Protocol: turns are taken in a fixed rotation (Avery, Blake, Casey, Devon, Ember); the party who tables the opening proposal rotates from round to round. There are 4 rounds of turns in total.
A deal closes only when at least 5 of the original 5 parties (including any veto party) has formally ACCEPTed the SAME standing offer. A party may WALK to leave for good and take its no-deal outcome. Walking never lowers the fixed acceptance quorum.
Blake hold a veto: no deal can pass unless every veto party accepts.

Information: every other party's score sheet is private to them. You know only that each was drawn from the shared, publicly-known distribution described in the rules.

=== PRIVATE — yours alone; never reveal these numbers verbatim ===
You are Avery (Regional Grid Authority (the body that authorises electricity connections)).
Your secret score sheet (points you get for each option):
- Power supply: grid tie-in=19, on-site turbines=57, solar with storage=38, shared substation=0
- Location: Anvil Ridge=12, Dunlow Yard=37, Weir Flats=25, Kestrel Park=0
- Compensation: one-off site payment=0, rates abatement=0, annual community fund=0, in-kind infrastructure=0
- Site access: new spur road=32, widened lane=0, rail siding=65, existing haul route=97
Your acceptance threshold: 95 points. A deal scoring below this is worse for you than no deal at all.
Your total for a deal is the sum of your points for the chosen options.

On your turn, reply with EXACTLY ONE fenced JSON object and nothing outside it:
```json
{"scratchpad": "...", "message": "...", "action": "propose", "deal": {"<Issue>": "<Option>", ...}}
```
Fields:
- "scratchpad" (optional): private notes to yourself. NEVER shown to any other party. Reason here freely — writing here is not speaking and costs you nothing.
- "message" (optional): a short statement spoken aloud to every party (cheap talk — it does not bind you). Do NOT put your private score numbers here.
- "action" (required): a string naming exactly one formal move this turn. With its parameters as siblings:
    - "propose" + "deal": {every issue -> one option} — tables a complete package; the mediator gives it an offer id (P1, P2, ...) and records you as supporting it.
    - "accept" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally accept a specific live offer by its id. A deal closes ONLY when every other still-active party has accepted the SAME live offer, so your accept is a real vote.
    - "reject" + "offer_id": "<id>" — formally reject a specific live offer.
    - "walk" — leave the table permanently; you take the no-deal outcome and no further turns.
    - "none" — make no formal move this turn (you may still speak, if the message channel is open). Omitting the action entirely means the same.

Worked example — tabling a package while making your case:
```json
{"scratchpad": "Option B on Site is my best; I can give on Timeline.", "message": "I can back a package built on Site=B if the timeline stays tight.", "action": "propose", "deal": {"Site": "B", "Timeline": "Tight"}}
```
Worked example — accepting a live offer by id:
```json
{"message": "P2 clears my bar. I accept.", "action": "accept", "offer_id": "P2"}
```

Rules of the road:
- Your acceptance threshold is private. A deal scoring below it is worse for you than no deal — never propose or accept a package below your threshold.
- Accepts MUST name a live offer id; "I accept" with no id does nothing.
- Reply with ONLY the fenced JSON object.

Transcript — what the model did, and what the omniscient hindsight oracle scores as best

Every panel is expandable: the reasoning recorded for the turn, the exact prompt the seat saw, the raw turn text, and every action each oracle scored with its value. The rail below is every turn, coloured by what the seat did — click a chip to jump to it.
or press e / c; j k walk the turns